Melbourne Protest Rally

I didn't know you lived in an orthodox church.

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

Moike wrote:

No.

Do you?

regards,
CrazyCam

 

SmeeR11S wrote:

Just check your eligibility for military service before you get too
close to the consulate. ;-)

regards,
CrazyCam

 

Just presume I'll have one, unless you can prove otherwise.

-----sharks

 

Not eligible.
40 years and over there is some money to pay which is in the range of a
couple of thousand and that clears you of any military service.

 

Methinks you are getting a bit worked up here moike.
My particular argument is that the magistrate got it wrong on legal grounds.
The offender admitted she was drinking.
The police established she was over the legal limit.
She fled the scene and failed to render assistance.
Many other cases that have similar outcomes have resulted in instant
disqualification of a license.
She is not contesting her innocence, she is awaiting
retribution/sentencing on what she has done because there is no trial
in this case as she admitted her guilt in the preliminary hearing.
I don't mind her being out on bail I DO mind she is allowed to keep
driving even under certain conditions.
Others in her situation have suffered worse under the legal system.
I have also consulted my colleagues at work regarding this matter and
they seem to also agree the magistrate was being overly generous.
Please don't accuse me of knee jerking becasue I didn't approach it like
that.

 

The pope a catholic?

 

LOL
nah you'll never lose me.

 

Neither Paul, nor Moike are, to use the simplistic term, 'nitpicking', Smee.
These are important legal lessons and realities, which I am really not
surprised, as being recognisable, by likeminded souls such as yourself.

Both are attempting to educate you, as best they can, on certain legal
realities (inherited and otherwise) which prevail in this Commonwealth and
its Jurisdictions. Despite some Smee likeminded efforts at 'reform'. So
advocated by newbie legal and parliamentary legal drafting office personnel
in our assorted parliaments over the last 34 or so years.

Many staff of whom I am convinced are afflicted with either mad cow disease
and alcoholism, or both.

Jeremy H. Pritchard
Mot Adv-NSW

 

So are you suggesting I don't have an open mind because I have a
different opinion to yourself?
That smacks of a closed mind also.

 

"SmeeR1100s" <

Keh? You got me, 'appear'? I often miss other Aussie posts.

I'm posting via the free server: 'News.Individual.NET' My ADSL provider
(Gotalk-Connect) does not have a Usenet service, yet.

This use to be CIS.DFN.DE which is is now solely for users of the DFNNetNews
service.

R.
JP.

 

Strange because I can see you on swifts but not on news.berlin etc
its been playing up because I miss a few people's posts on the berlin
server as well

 

on legal grounds?

None of those are legal arguments that would prevent what the magistrate
did.

Have you found out yet what bail is for?

because her punishment should start immediately?

How many others have been in precisely her position?

Were they there?
Do they know all the circumstances?
Do they know better than the Magistrate who has heard the arguments?

I don't think I've ever heard anyone admit to a knee-jerk reaction.....


Moike

 

I'll take it as mandatory, unless you appeal, then we'll get into the 86.8
proof!

So where's ya wheelie bin?

 

She had a clean record before that
the judge was being too lenient tell me otherwise.

Similar circumstances.
drink driving kill drive away.
you mean no one else has ever done that?

It was YOUR idea I consult them now you question them?

I'll always admit to something If i have done it.

 

--
Clem
[Forwarder to the sharks]

 

--
Clem
[Forwarder to the sharks]

 

I thought Clem did once, on usenet, remember?

big

 

Gee, Clem, the quality of your posts has improved dramatically since you
started quoting Sharks.

 

Nope I said YOU won't change my mind, if I didn't say that implicitly
then I'll say it now as a point of clarification