Magnetic fuel "conditioner"

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by Chris, Jan 20, 2009.

  1. Chris

    Chris Guest

    The question first: Has anyone tried using a magnetic fuel
    "conditioner" in their motorcycle?

    I bought a cold air intake for my truck recently and it came with a
    FuelBoss which is a $30 retail device to be installed just before your
    fuel injectors or carbeurator in your truck or car. It is supposed
    cause the hydrocarbon molecules to separate so they burn more
    completely and cleanly. Gimic? I don't know but from what I've read
    even the sceptics seem to be reporting a mileage increase in their
    vehicles. One mechanic reports buying one to prove it was a gimic and
    average mileage increased from 18mpg to 22mpg in his '97 Ford Ranger.

    Since it was free I'm going to give it a try on my '02 Dakota which is
    a gas hog with its 4.7L V8. I'm wondering how it owuld work on my '97
    Magna. I get around 43mpg with the bike and wonder if I could increase
    average MPG's with the FuelBoss. In straight economic terms it may
    take more than one season of riding in Maine to recoup the $30 in fuel
    savings. The other factor to consider is the extended range since I'm
    usually looking for a gas station at 90+ miles on a tank of fuel and
    starting to get very concerned if I haven't found fuel by 120 miles.

    Has anybody got experience with these devices?

    Thanks,
    Chris
     
    Chris, Jan 20, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Chris

    TOG@Toil Guest

    It's snake oil, pure and simple.
     
    TOG@Toil, Jan 20, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Chris

    Jack Hunt Guest

    I have a question for you: What kind of magnet attracts carbon based anything?
    If that thing really does attract hydrocarbons in the fuel line, wouldn't those
    hydrocarbons start bunching up on the inside of your fuel line at the magnet and
    eventually plug it off? If you dipped it in a container of gas, would it come
    out fuzzy with hydrocarbons like a magnet does when dipped in iron filings?
    It helps to know what that does. Your injection system senses the intake air
    temperature. When it's cold, it dumps in a little more fuel to act much like
    the choke on a carb system. It gets more gas so it runs better when it's cold.
    The cold air intake fools the system into thinking it's cold all the time, so it
    dumps in more gas. It runs a little better. It uses more gas.
    Stop for a minute and ask yourself this: If it's worth $30, why did they throw
    it in free?
    You can get the same increase by unplugging the AC clutch. Have you checked
    anywhere else except the people who are trying to push this thing?
    See if you still have the box that the Fuel Boss came in. It's worth more than
    the Fuel Boss.

    When traveling salesmen used to walk the streets trying to sell junk to
    unsuspecting homeowners, they had a code. Any time they found a sucker, they'd
    write on the gatepost or over the apartment door or on the mailbox, the date
    they scammed the occupants. The next huckster would see the note and know that
    resident was easy picking. They no longer mark their victims like that. They
    just look for a magnetic fuel conditioner and they know they've found another
    sucker. If there's anything to be happy about with this whole situation, be
    happy you didn't actually pay for this thing.

    My best advice would be to get a rubber band, and use that rubber band to
    tightly fasten a $5 bill to the magnetic fuel conditioner. Go to a bridge,
    preferably over deep water, and throw it just as far as you can throw it.

    The $5 is so you can say you lost something of value.
     
    Jack Hunt, Jan 20, 2009
    #3
  4. Chris

    Hank Guest

    since it was "free", what have you got to lose??
    Otherwise
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAX1000
     
    Hank, Jan 20, 2009
    #4
  5. Chris

    . Guest

    Laboratory experiments with extremely powerful magnets have
    *levitated* frogs and insects. You can google for "levitating frog" if
    you like.
    I think the theory is that the magnet polarizes molecules and aligns
    them, but I doubt if there is any effect on combustion that would
    enhance economy.
     
    ., Jan 20, 2009
    #5
  6. Chris

    Jack Hunt Guest

    My fuel filter strains out the frogs before they get to the magnet.
    So in other words, you agree that my post was correct and the device is
    worthless?
     
    Jack Hunt, Jan 20, 2009
    #6
  7. Chris

    TOG@Toil Guest

    What's *that* got to do with. Extremely powerful (and extrmely weak)
    magnets can 'levitate' chunks of steel..
    There isn't. Not one iota.
     
    TOG@Toil, Jan 20, 2009
    #7
  8. Chris

    Chris Guest

    Fair enough. I learned to check the ego at the "door" long ago when
    posting to newsgroups but that is why we post here...to get
    alternative takes on a subject or advise in a manner unhindered by
    face-to-face barriers to communication. I used to be a frequent
    responder to usenet groups since I consider myself to be somewhat of a
    SME on MS Excel but I've always practiced restraint when answering
    questions so as to improve the overall usefulness of this medium.

    FuelBoss: I'll give it a shot since others have reported success, even
    places other than the JC Whitney site. As the hydrocarbon molecules
    are not "collected" by the magnet and only separated more fully prior
    to combustion, I am not concerned about a buildup of said molecules in
    the fuel line adjacent to the magnet. But, thank you for the concern.
    Am I certain of the physics behind this device? No. I think Dr. Becker
    is probably the SME in that area and he's already weighed in on that
    front. But, I see no harm in trying it out since it arrived on my
    doorstep without any extra cost to me and if it is truly useless the
    "cost" would be the transport of an extra 1/2 pound of cargo in the
    engine compartment.

    The "cold" in the cold air intake may or may not be significant as you
    mentioned. However, Using a K&N filter is an improvement over OEM
    filters as I've experienced on a larger scale on UH-60's with the
    engine inlet barrier filters installed. Sure, in that application
    there is a bit of a "cost" in power but not much given the amount of
    air that passes through those air intakes feeding those big GE turbine
    engines. Now, granted, I'm an UH-60 crewchief/mechanic which in simple
    terms means I replace parts on the blackhawk when I'm not actually
    crewing it but I am aware that these "upgrades" are of limited
    economic value. However, the vehicle sounds better and has a little
    more pickup which is precisely the result I wanted. But, that has
    nothing to do with motorcycles so my apologies to the group.

    My original question stands: has anyone ever installed one of these
    devices on a motorcycle?

    Thanks.
     
    Chris, Jan 20, 2009
    #8
  9. Chris

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Why waste your time? In a previous job, I had to liaise with the UK
    laboratory that tested this sort (and all other sorts) of fuel saving
    devices, on behalf of the government. Pills you dropped into the fuel
    tank, ultra-violet this, chemical the other. They were *all* phoney.
    No, they are not. This is what the company claims, not what happens.

    That's fine. But there's a difference between improving gas flow
    through an engine and this sort of fantasy.
    Oh, there have been people, yeah, and they've claimed wonderful
    results, sometimes. There was one lunatic on ukrm, some years ago, but
    it turned out he had a vested interest in selling the things.

    Ask yourself this simple question: if fitting a magnet to a fuel line
    really improves fuel economy, why don't engine builders do it?
     
    TOG@Toil, Jan 20, 2009
    #9
  10. Chris

    . Guest

    Jack's remarks about the effects of magnets on carbon based materials
    made me remember the levitating frog story.

    Most people assume that magnetism only relates to *ferromagnetism*,
    i.e., the effect of magnets upon iron and steel.

    However, there are *other* forms of magnetism, e.g., diamagnetism and
    paramagnetism, which affect non-ferrous materials.

    I don't remember which is which, but a magnetic field can affect
    aluminum and living creatures. I have personally watched a rotating
    magnet field cause an aluminum pan to rotate (and get hot at the same
    time).

    OTOH, it's possible that a powerful magnetic field might be working on
    the *iron* in the frog's blood.

    But, what do I know?

    And, should I *care*?
     
    ., Jan 20, 2009
    #10
  11. Chris

    TOG@Toil Guest

    **** all, as ever.
     
    TOG@Toil, Jan 20, 2009
    #11
  12. Chris

    Jack Hunt Guest

    I often wonder that myself.
     
    Jack Hunt, Jan 20, 2009
    #12
  13. Obviously, because they've entered into a conspiracy with the
    oil companies. You guys should read usenet more regularly.

    What do I win ?
     
    Rob Kleinschmidt, Jan 20, 2009
    #13
  14. Chris

    ian field Guest

    Some of the gimmicks front a more technical explanation, something along the
    lines that non magnetic substances are that way because of the alignment (or
    otherwise) of the electron spins around their respective atoms, they claim
    that the prescience of a magnetic field re-arranges the electron spins and
    so alters the properties of the molecules.

    This is fundamental to the claims of some water softeners/pipe descalers,
    although the apparently most popular type which passes high frequency
    current through a coil wound round the pipe is a complete load of bollox,
    since the copper pipe acts as a shorted turn so the coil does absolutely
    nothing.

    Having said that, I wedged some powerful ceramic ring magnets into the
    insulation around the heater on my hot water tank where convection would
    expose the water to the magnetic field. When the heater needed replacement
    some years back, the plumber commented how easily the old heater unscrewed -
    he said with that model of boiler the thread was usually so badly seized
    with limescale it was unusual not to rip the threaded mounting out of the
    boiler.
     
    ian field, Jan 20, 2009
    #14
  15. Chris

    Bob Scott Guest

    Out of curiosity, did you see results of tests on friction modifiers
    such as slick 50? Any of the dry film, teflon based things[1]?

    My natural reaction to them is "snake oil" but I was a bit surprised
    recently to find a noted Laverda tuner talking about how he always used
    slick 50 in the engines he built.

    Bob

    [1] something that coats a component (such as a shim bucket) and reduces
    the friction sounds like a good idea but, if it works, why aren't
    manufacturers using it from new? Mind you, given my newest vehicle was
    imported in '91 they may be using them now for all I know
     
    Bob Scott, Jan 20, 2009
    #15
  16. <G>

    A night out with Spacker, at the Conspiracy Cafe of your choice.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Jan 20, 2009
    #16
  17. No. I used to talk to oil companies, though, and they derided the stuff.
    Again: "If it worked, we'd put it in ourselves..."

    Funnily enough, I remember that the testing lab did find that (for
    trucks, anyway, which was what they mostly did) two things did have a
    benefit.

    The first was aerodynamic kits, but their benefits were relatively
    small, because trucks in Europe are speed-limited to 90kph, and at that
    sort of speed you don't reap much benefit from a slippery truck.

    Air dams (on top of the cab, to fair in the leading edge of the trailer)
    were cheap and had a decent pay-back time. They work(ed).

    Spoilers, skirts and the rest did have an effect, but very small, and
    the payback time stretched into infinity.


    The second was pre-heater gadgets for old diesel engines that didn't
    have them.
    Induced expectation.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Jan 20, 2009
    #17
  18. Chris

    CBXXX Guest

    My Fuel Bosss came free with the purchase of my Elephant whistles (much
    more powerful than plain old deer whistles) Haven't seen an elephant in
    nJ since I put them on my bike.Works even driving the truck with the
    bike in the bed.
     
    CBXXX, Jan 21, 2009
    #18
  19. So has anyone who's seen a 1960s or 1970s Japanese motorcycle
    speedo or tacho in operation. The effect relies on eddy currents
    induced within the metal. Can't get eddy currents in hydrocarbon
    fuel (and stay alive...). Trust me, I'm a scientist. Trust me, magnetic
    fuel conditioners are pure bunkum!

    --
    Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
    Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
    GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
    WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
    KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
     
    Dr Ivan D. Reid, Jan 21, 2009
    #19
  20. Hey, what's wrong with the Genuine Venison-B-Gon[1] deer whistles?
    [1] http://www.beginnerbikers.org/forum/showpost.php?p=173634&postcount=17

    --
    Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
    Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
    GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
    WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
    KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
     
    Dr Ivan D. Reid, Jan 21, 2009
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.