[QUOTE] [QUOTE="Matt B"] [QUOTE] This was the original story. [URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/8149629.stm[/URL] I think it's a fundamental principle that you you can only receive driving penaties for driving offences. If it isn't, it bl**dy well ought to be. ;-) It is.[/QUOTE] No it isn't. [QUOTE] [...][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] There is a tiny exception in that there are some offences where you can get points on your driving licence for non-traffic-type offences.[/QUOTE] Ah, you agree. You can also lose your licence for offences unrelated to motor vehicles, driving, or roads and traffic - such as failing to pay child maintenance.[/QUOTE] Two wrongs don't make a right. If a penalty can be only be applied to someone with a driving licence, how can it be fair or reaonable? Driving penalties should be for driving offences. Driving penalties for non-driving offences are ludicrous and clearly wrong. Only idiots would argue otherwise.[/QUOTE] To take your argument to the end then, someone should only go to jail if they kidnapped someone and locked them in a room . Fines should only be given to people who steal money . . . That said, I do find that licence removal a little odd. But as others say, it is a penalty. He get didn't deterred by fines. You can hardly lock him away for a barking dog, expensive and putting people in prison is that last thing on an overcrowded system. It's a penalty that will inconvenience him. So the more I think about it the more I can't see why not.