M/C Clothing for Real Women

AshWoman, Shirley.

 

"I will not pay your Chinese bride mind games."

 

*hides*

 

Just try eBay. I picked up soem great leather for just 32ukp. When I
was looking I noticed lots of *cough* larger sizes.

 

They pinch my toes.

--
| ___ Salad Dodger
|/ \
_/_____\_ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/KH500A8/TS250C
|_\_____/_| ..64741../..15361.../..3157./.19406
(>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 PM#5
|__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 WG*
\ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4
\|^|/ ANORAK#17
'^' RBR-Visited:14 Pts: 270 Miles:1248

 

*impressed*
Lasted well, you must have some form of Tantric Molly tolerance.

 

<>:

What the hell are you doing looking at teenage acne forums???

Why can't you be a decent, fine, upstanding citizen like cane and
persuade them to 'handle your axe' by other more traditional means.

You could offer oboe lessons, for example.

 

You are paranoid, all I hinted at is I'm not a 12, FFS, I can't help
it if I post something about size. I have been very careful to not to
post things to offend you and other posters sensitive nature on gender
issues, I really have. Perhaps I should ask you and Sweller's
permission as macho police before I post. FFS, get a grip the pair of
you. Perhaps we shouldn't tolerate Linger's and Cane's posts about
their size. Hell, I've done the macho things myself and I still enjoy
doing some of them. But, I am what I am, live with it.

 

It's not about offending 'macho' sensitivities. It's not about people
being sensitive about gender issues.

It's all about people's boredom filters being breached and the content
of your posts seeming to be reduced to making the same statement ("I'm a
girl").

At least that's my reading of it.

 

begin 666 clip_image001.gif[/QUOTE]

[snip]

Oi!

This is a non-binary newsgroup.

 

To be honest mate I think you're wrong and both Andy and sweller are
being unfair.If you can show me otherwise I will gladly appologise.

I have tried to be very careful and not post the "I'm a girl" type of
responses. By inferring that; "I'm hiding" to Adie. And it was in
reply to Adie. It's a bit of a private joke between me, her and a few
other girls on the group because I'm not size 12. I know that human
nature being what it is people will look for the "girlie" type of
elements in my posts. I came out to a pretty unforgiving group and I
know that when the initial impact was over I was going to get
scrutinized and to be fair it hasn't happened as much as I expected. I
see very little difference inferring that I'm not a size 12 to that of
any other person male or female [1] posting about how much weight
they've lost [2] but of course when I do it, it's because I'm all
girlie and flowery. That simply isn't the case. I do admit that when I
first came out I got carried away. But, that's no difference to what I
used to be like.



I have gone through my past 300 posts and TBH I don't see the
evidence. I certainly don't try to be in people's faces but I suppose
just posting as "Molly" will do that.



Some examples of what might have been mistaken for "girlie posts"

*** My Reply was **
Yes, they got rid of my slippers pretty quickly.
FYI, hormones don't get rid of facial hair, they have to be plucked.

_______________________________________________________

Of course Bee posted this but I suppose I shouldn't have replied.

*** My Reply was **
You are correct.
http://www.passiongear.com/size_chart.asp
But why is it that a size ten in one store is an eight in another?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------



Is this a girlie post?

Ø And the run up to it is down hill. So even if you shut off at
the

Ø I wouldn't mind having a go at that but my bones would probably
object
as would other parts of my anatomy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------





Perhaps I shouldn't have replied to Lozzo's post?

I just realised what I rit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

This from AndrewR was about my Triumph but I'm certain people will see
something else.

*** My Reply was **
Hmmmmm, fair point. I'm not really in a position to ridicule anyone.
But I don't care.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
--

My "Oh Dear" post was to show that if I had been dressed as Alan I
would probably have got done.





Perhaps I shouldn't have replied to this:

*** My Reply was **

Nice......you bitch



This may have been OTT

*** My Reply was **
Yes me.
These cost me 32UKP
http://www.mollyg.net/bikers/newsuit6.jpg
I am well chuffed.





[1] Or in between ;-)

[2] > http://www.cane.ukrm.btinternet.co.uk/images/08-05-04.jpg

Now if I had done that I would have got slated.

 

[snip]

this triggered my binary filter, you twat...

 

Molly wrote

I think you have been a bit more restrained as it goes. Certainly since
folks had a pop at you a few weeks back.

Mind you my opinion counts for **** all.

 

The actual binary, or the length of the post?

 

oh, there was an actual binary?

<fx: looks>

so there was : double-twat.

 

Sorry mate. I don't know why?

 

Because you put a binary in it, you muppet!

 

Where?

 

Actually, no. It was because it was more than 200 lines long - many
of us have our newsreader to not retrieve articles longer than a
certain length. The default on Agent is 500 lines, I believe.

Darsy didn't even see the little smiley that Molly had embedded in
there!

 

except, yes.

I did after Blaney pointed it out.