London bus lanes

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by ogden, Apr 12, 2011.

  1. ogden

    ogden Guest

    I was chatting with V the other day about motorcycles being allowed in
    London bus lanes, and how it's still only on a trial basis (even after
    two and a half years). Hopefully it'll be made a permanent arrangement,
    but while poking around the TFL web site I came across the study of the
    original 18 month trial.

    It's interesting (if dry) reading. Key points seem to be:

    51% of motorcycles make legal use of bus lanes. 6% did so illegally
    before the trial began

    Motorcycles are significantly more likely to exceed the speed limit
    where permitted to use bus lanes

    Cyclists are 176% more likely to be involved in a collision, but it's
    often the cyclist's fault and rarely if ever due to the presence of a
    motorcycle in the bus lane. Indeed no statistically valid link was found
    between motorcycles being alloweed in bus lanes and cyclists having more
    accidents.

    Motorcycles are more likely to be taken out by a car turning left
    across the bus lane, but not by any significant degree (though that's
    not the spin they put on it on the TFL web site, which doesn't bode
    well).

    Pedestrians are generally safer than before.

    The conclusion's a little worrying though:

    "The effect of permitting motorcycles into bus lanes has been assessed
    after 10 months of implementation. This analysis period is the minimum
    where any reasonably large effects can be ascertained. This has
    identified that motorcyclists appear to be less safe since the scheme
    has been introduced. There were no changes in the safety of cyclists and
    pedestrians that could be directly attributed to the motorcycles being
    permitted access to the bus lanes."

    Hopefully the left-turn collisions will have reduced a bit over the
    second 18 month trial and they'll keep letting us use the bus lanes.
    It'll be a bit of a fucker having to go back to playing chicken with
    oncoming traffic twice a day.
     
    ogden, Apr 12, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Frankly, I was always happier tootling along the BL at 30mph than dicing
    with the cunting U-turning taxis and other arseholes while filtering
    along the outside. The left-turning cars are catered for by keeping a
    watch out for tossers and slowing at junctions as a matter of
    self-preservation. Even with that, it's still much better progress than
    the other option.
    I wonder if TfL is infiltrated by lycra-wearing cunts who have an axe to
    grind, in spite of the stats showing their axe is blunt and rusty as
    ****.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Apr 12, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. ogden

    Derek Turner Guest

    If it weren't there'd be no need to grind it, would there?
     
    Derek Turner, Apr 12, 2011
    #3
  4. ogden

    Gyp Guest

    Isn't that the problem though? From my experience in London, most folk
    don't tootle along at 30mph, then go like **** the moment a space opens up.

    I've tried riding/driving at 30 in central London (after participating
    in the speed awareness course that the Met offered me) and it's a
    fucking nightmare.

    When we went from the town centre out to Dover on holiday at 4 in the
    morning a couple of years ago, even though there was hardly any traffic
    on the road, everyone else was treating each and every traffic light
    like a grand prix.
     
    Gyp, Apr 12, 2011
    #4
  5. ogden

    Hog Guest

    I use the bus lanes in Leeds, no idea of the legal status, but I don't sit
    in them, only jinking left when the traffic in the primary lanes has stopped
    or slows right down. Undertaking effectively. I'd say that folk turning left
    without looking is part of my rationale.

    FWIW years ago some clutz caught me out in Edinburgh. 1000EXUP, moving very
    slowly (and cautiously) up the empty inside lane lane, the right lane (4
    lanes, 2 each way) being stationary. Vehicle turned left as I was beside
    him, no opportunity to avoid him. The Court and the insurance companies
    found 50/50. Bizarre but they held I should either stop way back in an empty
    lane or proceed and take the consequences.
     
    Hog, Apr 12, 2011
    #5
  6. ogden

    ogden Guest

    The only person with an axe to grind appears to be you.
     
    ogden, Apr 12, 2011
    #6
  7. I'm surprised you've only just found this. There has been a load of
    pressure from cyclists to get motorbikes out of the bus lanes after the
    first trial period ended. The fact that Boris cycles has been used as a
    stick by other cyclists to hit the Mayor with! Bizarre but true. They
    were distinctly displeased when Boris announced a further trial. TfL
    are running a series of radio adverts warning motorists about turning
    across bus lanes and needing to watch out for motorcyclists.

    I was reading something the other day which showed that accident rates
    were still disproportionately high for motorcyclists in London despite
    efforts to improve awareness amongst other road users and to boost
    training for motorcyclists (TfL fund Bikesafe in London). It is the
    accident rate issue that will drive the politicians and TfL to do
    something - probably something that bikers won't like!

    I suspect the Mayor would like to please both cyclists and motorcyclists
    but unfortunately the way the research is going it is highly likely one
    of them will be disappointed no matter which way the final decision
    goes. He can't please all of the people all of the time with this issue.
     
    Paul Corfield, Apr 12, 2011
    #7
  8. Bound to be. One such twat had one of those 'witness cams' mounted on
    his helmet. All I think it was recording was the number of red lights
    the **** sailed through.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Apr 12, 2011
    #8
  9. ogden

    ogden Guest

    It's the first time I've gone looking for it.
    And motorcyclists need to assume that any and every vehicle around it
    might turn left across the bus lane. It's what I do, and I've had no
    near misses so far.

    A lot of people ride like total dicks though, so it's hardly a surprise
    there have been collisions.

    Given that the only people for whom there's been any appreciable
    increase in risk are motorcyclists, I'd rather they left bus lanes
    permanently open and let the riders take their chances.

    I certainly feel a hell of a lot safer in a bus lane than filtering up
    the outside of a line of traffic, and I'd rather it stayed that way. I
    fully expect to be disappointed.

    The bit that stood out for me was the reference to speeding
    motorcyclists. I'm surprised there hasn't been more of a crackdown.
    Pleased, but surprised.
     
    ogden, Apr 12, 2011
    #9
  10. How so? Nearly every word in the main body of my post agrees with your
    later post. I'm fairly sure about the lycra-clad cunts, though.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Apr 12, 2011
    #10
  11. ogden

    DozynSleepy Guest

    On 12/04/2011 18:19, Hog wrote:
    snip
    I've just had to accept 50/50 with white van man too. Similarly taken
    out right beside him but since he claims he was signalling and we don't
    have any video evidence there's not much else I can do. So much for
    surveillance Britain, two CCTV cameras at either end of the street, both
    looking the other way. Compared to the filtering I saw this morning I
    was the epitome of care. Guy on a KTM with matching goretex was having a
    lot of high risk fun this morning dicing with traffic <fx: jealous>.
     
    DozynSleepy, Apr 13, 2011
    #11
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.