Kids & motorbikes - from the news

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by bikerbetty, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. bikerbetty

    Theo Bekkers Guest

    Scientists:- People who pontificate about your health and welfare whilst
    working on making a bigger, better WMD.

    Theo
     
    Theo Bekkers, Sep 12, 2007
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. bikerbetty

    Theo Bekkers Guest

    I have a ten yo grandson, now I know how granddad felt.

    Theo
     
    Theo Bekkers, Sep 12, 2007
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. bikerbetty

    Yeebok Guest

    Yes, my son shows me how tolerant and patient my own father was. He's 13
    tomorrow.
     
    Yeebok, Sep 12, 2007
    #23
  4. bikerbetty

    Yeebok Guest

    My son, that is - Dad's 65..
     
    Yeebok, Sep 12, 2007
    #24
  5. bikerbetty

    Yeebok Guest

    Simply put, a parent who lets their kid ride a bike of any sort for the
    first time without giving them an area where they can't hurt themselves
    is asking for trouble. I feel for the parents don't get me wrong but the
    bottom line is that with a different location, the child is likely to
    have survived and even unscathed.

    I get the feeling the family has "some land" or more accurately I'd be
    surprised if there wasn't a fenced off paddock suitable nearby. Either
    way the Dad has to live with that, and that it could have been avoided.

    Sure the bike had training wheels and was limited to 10km/h and he had a
    helmet but I think everything was covered and considered *except* for
    the location of the ride. Had anything else gone wrong the young lad
    would likely have survived.

    But :
    a) Dad didn't have time to stop the bike
    b) Dad didn't think to locate the ride elsewhere
    c) Dad didn't avoid the embankment.
    d) Dad can't run at 10km/h.
    e) Dad didn't fence off the embankment or river.

    It doesn't say HOW he went down there, just that he did. I expect that
    there would have been some clue he was heading that way a reasonable
    amount of time before the accident. We're talking 10km/h here remember.
    Had there been a fence in the way I dare say the bike would not have
    reached the river.

    Like I said, I feel for the parents I can't imagine what they're likely
    going through. The bottom line is that they created the entire problem
    whether their intentions were good or not.
     
    Yeebok, Sep 12, 2007
    #25
  6. I think you'll find that had the kid ended up with brain damage
    following a head clash at an under 7's soccer game, chances are this
    same academic would've been out there pointing out the need for
    restrictions on all team and ball sports for young children.
     
    intact.kneeslider, Sep 12, 2007
    #26
  7. bikerbetty

    Dale Porter Guest

    According to another report I read that included statements from the father,
    he says he was running alongside his son and had restricted the speed of the
    minibike. But his son still careened down an embankment and struck his head
    on a submerged log.

    Cheers,
    Dale.
     
    Dale Porter, Sep 12, 2007
    #27
  8. bikerbetty

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Jeeze; I was 12 when my father was 66. We must've skipped a generation!
     
    Knobdoodle, Sep 16, 2007
    #28
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.