In the beginning there was physics ...

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Howard, Dec 20, 2005.

  1. Howard

    Howard Guest

    everything followed on from that.

    Discuss:

    with special reference to evolution, creationists and (FFS)
    intelligent design.
     
    Howard, Dec 20, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Howard

    Eiron Guest

    ITYF that the universe worked quite well for a few years before people
    had physics.
     
    Eiron, Dec 20, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Howard

    muddy Guest

    I'm more interested in fizzics.
     
    muddy, Dec 20, 2005
    #3
  4. Howard

    Kevin Stone Guest

    Surely maths underlies everything?
     
    Kevin Stone, Dec 20, 2005
    #4
  5. Watching that 'Walking with munt// monsters' series, I was impressed by
    the graphics, though sometimes the script was drivelish.
    --
    Dave

    GS850x2 XS650

    On UKRM you're just a **** with opinions.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Dec 21, 2005
    #5
  6. I've got a spiffing camping math. Rolls up a treat, it does.

    Anyway, maths came along later - the universe just got on with stuff.
    --
    Dave

    GS850x2 XS650

    On UKRM you're just a **** with opinions.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Dec 21, 2005
    #6
  7. Howard

    Molly Guest

    In the beginning there was nothing now there more evolved nothings.
     
    Molly, Dec 21, 2005
    #7
  8. Howard

    Big Dave Guest

    I've got a torque wrench
    And a digital vernier caliper[1]
    And an angle grinder
    And a lump hammer

    I've evovled into a precision engineer, me.

    [1] It doubles up as adjustable spanner

    Dave
     
    Big Dave, Dec 21, 2005
    #8
  9. Howard

    darsy Guest

    I'm lost for words.
     
    darsy, Dec 21, 2005
    #9
  10. Howard

    Leo Guest

    The thing that really upsets me about these monster / dinosaur natural
    history programs is that ALL the bloody things roar.

    Anything remotely dinosaurish on these programs is given a rattling
    great roar like godzilla and jurassic park biggies, and AFAIK there is
    absolutly **** all evidence to suggest reptiles even had larynxes, let
    alone could roar.

    Or the 'mammal-like reptiles' that were supposedly our ancestors. The
    fuckers didn't even evolve ears until later, so what the **** use is a
    roar in the first place?

    Utter crap.

    Really gets my goat.


    <trails off into muttering and grumbling silence as realises he's
    probably gone a bit far...>
     
    Leo, Dec 21, 2005
    #10
  11. Howard

    Nicknoxx Guest

    Many dinosaurs *did* have a laynyx and *could* roar. See
    http://www.bowdoin.edu/~dbensen/Spec/Neohadrosauria.html
    for examples.

    As a general rule, the BBC will, when making natural history programmes,
    allow a certain amount of creative licence, but what is shown has to be
    behaviourally correct as far as possible. If they don't do that, then
    they have to have a "reconstruction" tag to make it obvious.

    That said I've just spent the last two days removing the shadow of a
    helicpoter from a shot of a mountain which was a right PITA.
     
    Nicknoxx, Dec 21, 2005
    #11
  12. Howard

    Leo Guest

    Your example is taken from the eocene period - far, far later than
    when these particular creatures where running around.

    I'm not denying that larynxes evolved. I've got one. The
    stellosaurines are a small group of hadrosaurs - a tiny example from a
    huuuge number of different animals over an enormously long period of
    time.

    I'm just pissed off that anything larger than a horse in the ancient
    world inevitably had to make more noise than an elephant and roar like
    a lion.

    Your example page, apart from being far too long, only mentions *roar*
    once, and I had to search for that. What about whistles, hisses,
    rumbles and cheeps?

    Even a komodo dragon only hisses, ffs.
    Creative licence: "It's a big lizard. Make it frightening. No, make
    it more frightening. I know, make it roar."
    You have my sympathy. For what it's worth.
     
    Leo, Dec 21, 2005
    #12
  13. Howard

    Howard Guest

    So you're with Darwin then are you?
     
    Howard, Dec 21, 2005
    #13
  14. Howard

    Leo Guest

    Don't you start!

    Grrrrrrrr.

    See? You've got me doing it now! Does that mean I'm revolving?

    And to answer your question, "Yes."
     
    Leo, Dec 21, 2005
    #14
  15. Howard

    Howard Guest

    He's got his 1000 postings up there^^ with the best bike thread.

    Now can we get back to the matter in question while we still have
    some Americans listening in!
     
    Howard, Dec 21, 2005
    #15
  16. True. And the behaviour of them... htf can anyone tell how they behaved?

    What a load of bollocks.

    Like I said, the graphics were good though; I'd never paid any real
    attention to the pre-dinosaur era, it was all just sand and trees and
    rocks and things, but I suppose 3 progs was all they could get out of it
    without it getting any more boring than it was.
    --
    Dave

    GS850x2 XS650

    On UKRM you're just a **** with opinions.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Dec 21, 2005
    #16
  17. Howard

    darsy Guest

    Maths is much more important than just a "tool". But I can't be
    bothered explaining why I feel that way.
     
    darsy, Dec 22, 2005
    #17
  18. Howard

    Daz Guest

    It rocks along with anyone that understands it *really* well [1].
    It's the only subject other than Technical Design I was really
    interested in at work. If I had the time I'd love to do a degree in
    it.

    [1] Sad, I know.
     
    Daz, Dec 22, 2005
    #18
  19. Howard

    gomez Guest

    Really? I thought the way the creatures (didn't) interact with the
    environment (ie the way their feet didn't quite touch the ground) was
    well naff for this day and age.
     
    gomez, Dec 24, 2005
    #19
  20. Not quite. I must admit that mathematics is one of the bases
    upon which physics is founded. But after that, chemistry is applied physics,
    biology is applied chemistry, and philosophy is misapplied biology.
    Oh, you wanted the half-hour argument! Room 402, down the corridor.

    --
    Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration,
    Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
    GSX600F, RG250WD(MIA) "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
    WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
    KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
     
    Dr Ivan D. Reid, Dec 24, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.