If you don't want ID cards to be introduced

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by raden, May 20, 2005.

  1. raden

    porl Guest

    What civil liberties have we lost?
    No, what they're doing is giving you a bone to chew on to take your mind off
    things that really are important.
    No, it isn't clear at all. It's all relative. What will probably happen is
    that you'be inundated with even more spam mail than before.
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. raden

    Switters Guest

    Like what?
     
    Switters, May 20, 2005
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. raden

    porl Guest

    Little things like accountability for war, European integration,
    environmental stuff, etc. Stuff that all fades into the background when
    we're presented with the atrocity of ID cards and the infringement of our
    Personal Liberties.
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #23
  4. raden

    Switters Guest

    Phew... for a moment I thought we'd missed something insidious.
     
    Switters, May 20, 2005
    #24
  5. raden

    AndrewR Guest

    Don't you follow the news? The basic right to be considered innocent until
    proven guilty, the right not to be detained without trial, the right to have
    evidence presented a court of your piers, the right to a trial by jury, the
    right to silence, the right not to have to incriminate yourself.

    At the moment the government is placating people by saying that these
    restrictions only apply to terrorists, but nobody has set a bar for what you
    have to do to be a terrorist.
    Nothing is more important the civil liberties. Nothing. Civil liberties
    are what preseve the line between politicians being our servants and being
    our masters.

    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1, Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, DS#5, COSOC# Suspended, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, May 20, 2005
    #25
  6. raden

    Colin Irvine Guest

    Neat point. But I don't think it follows that you shouldn't object to
    ID cards if you don't like the idea, as long as you don't take your
    eye of the bigger balls IYSWIM.

    Personally I do object to ID cards, but what stopped me voting Labour
    for the first time in my life was the Iraq war abroad and imprisonment
    without trial at home.
     
    Colin Irvine, May 20, 2005
    #27
  7. raden

    porl Guest

    Oh my god! We must be days away from the One True Evil unveiling its master
    plan of putting us all under house arrest for no reason whatsoever! Run for
    the hills!

    Do you think the definition of terrorist is as open to interpretation as
    "biker"? Maybe there's an Irq.destiny.terrorist newsgroup somewhere where
    hard-core fundamentalists are chiding those of a lesser persuasion for not
    sleeping with high explosives under the bed.

    Anyway being an ugly northern monkey has got to be fairly far down the list
    of entry requirements so I wouldn't worry just yet.
    You live in Dreamworld. Politicians are Business's bitches and have been for
    decades. Not only is it not always about you, it's never about you.

    Anyway, you seem to still be free enough to ride motorycles, despite your
    obvious and well known proclivity for hurling them at tubular metal
    contructions, so what you whining about?
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #28
  8. raden

    porl Guest

    That's my point: that the furore over ID cards seems to do exactly that. We
    know the governent is adept at slipping out of the noose while pointing and
    saying "look over there!" and that's how I feel about ID cards.

    I've got the song Razzle Dazzle going around my head now

    #How can they see with sequins in their eyes....
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #29
  9. raden

    Colin Irvine Guest

    Yeah, I guess the same goes for me. I could end up doing a Fred Hill,
    but probably not for this.
     
    Colin Irvine, May 20, 2005
    #30
  10. AndrewR wrote
    At last, a role for ukrm in mainstream society.
     
    steve auvache, May 20, 2005
    #31
  11. raden

    porl Guest

    So, for instance AndrewR is concerned about the victimisation of Asians in
    the country? Or believes that the restrictions will someday soon extend to
    himself and his family?

    This is just another piece of the "war on terror". To not tackle it at its
    root, but to get up in arms (hur hur), over a somewhat implausible idea of a
    military state is typical of this country's poptastic approach to its own
    government's ethics.

    "Apparently the war in Iraq was not legal"
    "Yeah...but...I don't know, maybe it's better that we did it anyway"
    "Also I hear that they're going to introduce mandatory identity cards"
    "WHAT?!! I'm going to tear my own eyes out, put them on a pike and march to
    Downing Street!"
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #32
  12. Boots Blakeley, May 20, 2005
    #33
  13. raden

    AndrewR Guest

    The point, Captain Sarcastic, is that once these laws on on the books then
    it's a done deal. So you don't just have to trust in this government being
    benign, you also have to trust the government that follows them, and the
    government that follows them and so on for the next couple of hundred years.

    You have to absolutely trust that nobody is ever going to get into power,
    dismantle democracy and then say that anybody who opposes them is an enemy
    of the state and needs to be arrested. Because, you know, history shows us
    that that kind of thing really can happen.

    Even to sarcastic people.

    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1, Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, DS#5, COSOC# Suspended, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, May 20, 2005
    #34
  14. raden

    Catman Guest

    That is actually making more sense and is far more scary than even I
    originally thought.

    Still don't wnat a fukcing ID card though.
    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 155 TS 75 TS
    Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, May 20, 2005
    #35
  15. raden

    Catman Guest

    Useful, perhaps. But why should the voters be forced to have something that
    is useful *if they don't want it*. Or do you mean useful to someone else?
    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 155 TS 75 TS
    Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, May 20, 2005
    #36
  16. raden

    Catman Guest

    Equally, I've never seen quoted a decent reason to have an ID card (as
    opposed to an entitlement document, of which I have a plethora)

    Care to go for it? I am genuinely interested in what people think is going
    to be the benefit.
    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 155 TS 75 TS
    Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, May 20, 2005
    #37
  17. Catman wrote
    I am agin 'em. However, I sat here for a minute thinking of a few
    arguments in favour, in order that I could take the piss out of it in
    some way with a silly post and very quickly came to the conclusion that
    as a means of identification there is simply no need for any extra over
    and above what I can currently provide.

    As a means of oppression they have got to be a number one tool though.
     
    steve auvache, May 20, 2005
    #38
  18. raden

    Catman Guest

    As above.
    Sure, if you don't have a passport or driving licence, they may well be
    useful, but I cannot conceive of a single instance where could need one
    unless there are now, or are going to be soon, situations in which I will
    be *required* to prove my identity *on the spot*. If we do end up with
    those situtations, we're in trouble IMO.

    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 155 TS 75 TS
    Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, May 20, 2005
    #39
  19. He's good. I subscribe to his newsletter.
     
    The Older Gentleman, May 20, 2005
    #40
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.