If you don't want ID cards to be introduced

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by raden, May 20, 2005.

  1. raden

    raden Guest

    raden, May 20, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. raden

    Robbo Guest

    You could make a token stand here Bolox.

    If you got nowt to hide, are of decent descent and a law abiding citizen
    over the age of 18 why not have them.

    Bloody good idea I reckon, should have been done at the end of the last war
    when we still had an Empire.


    --


    --
    Robbo

    Trophy 1200 1998
    BotaFOF #19. E.O.S.M 2001/2002/2003/2004.
    B.O.S.M 2003, 2004, 2005
    FURSWB#1 KotL..YTC449
    PM#7
    ..
     
    Robbo, May 20, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. raden

    Greybeard Guest

    Bollox
     
    Greybeard, May 20, 2005
    #3
  4. raden

    NickyD Guest

    Its not that I have stuff to hide so much as I have no fucking trust
    whatso-fucking-ever in an army of couldn't-get-a-decent-fucking-job
    beaureacrats and a national database run by a government with an appaling IT
    record that even makes me look halfway fucking comepetent. Besides, the
    criminal sections of society will no doubt find loopholes, workarounds etc
    while we the taxpayers have to fork out a bloody fortune to fund this
    absolute piece of nonsense

    For a more reasoned argument, google for Bruce Schneier or search The
    Register for relevant articles.
     
    NickyD, May 20, 2005
    #4
  5. In uk.rec.motorcycles, raden amazed us all with this pearl of wisdom:
    "I will refuse to register for an ID card but only if 3,000,000 people
    will sign up."

    WTF does that mean?
     
    Whinging Courier, May 20, 2005
    #5
  6. raden

    porl Guest

    In that context it is, to view it as a defense against a country you're at
    war with is silly. However, there are a plethora of more mundane situations
    where it might be useful.
    Like what?
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #6
  7. Greybeard wrote
    Indeed and even worse when you consider that the mainlanders thinks of
    us Anglo Saxons as the standard bearers of Liberalism. Hardly a good
    example to set the inferior races is it,
     
    steve auvache, May 20, 2005
    #7
  8. raden

    Ace Guest

    Funny how they never seem to come up owith decent examples. It's
    always "Big Brother" this and "I don't trust them not to misuse it"
    that. How, and why, people think it will be misused to reduce their
    individual personal freedom I've never seen quoted.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, May 20, 2005
    #8
  9. raden

    porl Guest

    I have a sneaking suspician that Big Issues like the ID card basically
    appease the people that think it will actually make a difference to security
    and give the people that want to attack the government an easy target that's
    utterly trivial to bang on about, forgoing the things that really matter.

    It's almost as if it's a calculated ploy...
     
    porl, May 20, 2005
    #9
  10. ID cards, tattoos, chipping and fingerprinting at birth, wearing yellow
    crosses. It all starts to make sense...
     
    eric the brave, May 20, 2005
    #10
  11. raden

    Dan White Guest

    Ok, let's make it simpler. I don't fucking want one. Given that the
    Government is supposed to work for us and not the other way round, I object
    to them pissing away billions of pounds on a pointless project that will
    delivery precisely none of the "security" they are using as a tool to
    frighten people too thick to question it into accepting.

    That better?
     
    Dan White, May 20, 2005
    #11
  12. raden

    Greybeard Guest

    A little bit like wot Hitler did to the Jews then really ;o)
    Have a number tattooed on you arm.
    Nowadays a barcode tattooed on your arm at birth sorts it. You could use it
    as your passport, driving license, credit card and any other place where a
    carried bit of paper would do.
    I can see it catching on ;o))
    No need for ID cards then really
     
    Greybeard, May 20, 2005
    #12
  13. raden

    Greybeard Guest

    Good point, and very well argued ;o)
     
    Greybeard, May 20, 2005
    #13
  14. raden

    flash Guest

    I don't want one cos they will be run by people using computers and they
    will, undoubtly, **** up some of the details somewhere along the line.

    I already had my credit rating shot to pieces once because of an admin
    error, I would not like to have me shot to pieces because of a similar
    error.
     
    flash, May 20, 2005
    #14
  15. With a sub-dermal microchip you could stop doors opening for the wrong
    person and stuff like that.

    Has anybody else noticed how this political correctness thing is slowly
    turning into thought crime or is it just me?
     
    eric the brave, May 20, 2005
    #15
  16. raden

    Eiron Guest

    We did have ID cards at the end of the last war when we still had an
    empire.
    Of course the only people old enough to remember are too senile to
    remember....
     
    Eiron, May 20, 2005
    #16
  17. In uk.rec.motorcycles, Greybeard amazed us all with this pearl of
    wisdom:
    So what happens when you get old and fat?
     
    Whinging Courier, May 20, 2005
    #17
  18. raden

    Greybeard Guest

    I had this discussion earlier today with an elderly chap.
    Senile he may have been but I don't think so. But he said that we never had
    ID cards in the war or after, but it was advisable to carry your ration book
    with you.
    Did we have ID cards then?? My late Dad always reckoned we didn't.
     
    Greybeard, May 20, 2005
    #18
  19. raden

    Greybeard Guest

    I am old an fat ;o)

    I guess the barcode will stretch a bit, as long as the sequence stays the
    same, it should be read ok.

    Best we put it on the forehead then..
     
    Greybeard, May 20, 2005
    #19
  20. raden

    AndrewR Guest

    Ace wrote:

    Well think of it more as a rallying point then.

    A lot of civil liberties have been lost in the past few years and a lot more
    stand to be lost. What the government is doing is using salami tactics;
    moving in very small steps so that no one action is big enough to garner
    enough popular opposition to make them stop.

    In order to make them stop a stand has to be taken somewhere and this is a
    big issue with a lot of public support. It's a clear point where civil
    liberties clash with government ambition and that makes it a natural point
    at which to fight the battle.

    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1, Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, DS#5, COSOC# Suspended, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, May 20, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.