Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes

Oh. Did your post actually *say* that? No. It said :

You'll note there's a 9 hour window I generally don't post in. Happens
to be the time I am at work funnily enough.

 

Thousands ? Technically, no - aus.motorcycles is a place to talk about
motorcycles..You, you mean ? Are you that fat you're worth thousands of
people .. or just such a wanker ??

 

YAWN - seen it before.

I can remember these 'quotes' being posted to usenet 600 years ago for
****'s sake.

 

I chortled so much at this one that my missus sprung me and demanded I
explain what was so funny.
Another victim of Al Qaeda!!

 

Damn Google - find frigging anything with that ..

 

what argument ??? it`s a crock, ignore...

 

who is "we" cockbreath.....

 

Except Harold Holt...

 

I fail to see the relevance of bringing Theo's sex life into this
discussion...?

 

Yes, I remember well when he disappeared,
I used to drink in the Holt's pub in the north of Melbourne
had many drinks there
think Andrew ran it, but that is a long time ago

 

Leave my weight out of it

and stop top posting, readers don't have a clue what you are replying to

 

That's alright, no one has a clue what is being discussed anyway.

 

Some of the biggest flame wars I've seen took place in various jokes
forums. Posting jokes there is no guarantee for any better response than
here - in fact, it probably invites more flak than Harsh Week (tm).

 

Even by aus.cars standards this thread is completely fucked.

 

Harsh week? [checks calendar] So it is ......... ****!

 

The funny thing with newsgroups is that no-one ever admits they are wrong
directly. There are plenty of indirect ways though which are much more
satisfying to extract from stupid people such as yourself. The big sidestep
followed by insults, as you have done, is one of the classics.

Michael

 

Ahh ... you sidestepped *again* and didn't answer the question. Give it
another try, you'll get it eventually.

Michael

 

I don't really think that's true. I'd prefer you post funny stuff here so I
can read it. But when someone points out that your jokes are not true or are
old you should just agree (assuming that is correct which in this case it
is). Then we wouldn't get drawn into a 3 week long thread with your idiot
mate damien.

 

Why would I admit to be being wrong when I am not? And why would you
claim to be intelligent when you are not?

The world is a curious place indeed, when the innocent are declared
guilty, and the idiots claim to be smart!

 

So what? If they're so old, and have been posted so many times, then are
they really worth wasting even MORE time pointing that out? Surely there
are more important things to be worrying about to that extent? Who gives
a toss if the OP claimed they were from 2007? Big fucking deal.