Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes

Insults? I thought I was defending you, and then you turn around and
have a go at me for it. Some people just don't know how to be grateful!

 

How is it even possible to sidestep when there was nothing worth
responding to in the pile of shit you called a post? You rambled on
about nothing, made a couple of "points" that had pretty much zero
relevance, and now you're getting upset because I didn't respond in the
manner you demanded?

oh dear, isn't someone being a tad precious today? lol

 

Maybe you are right but do you really think all of these things are correct?

Michael

 

I'll bet he regrets posting at all

Michael

 

That is true.

Michael

 

Certainly:

"Steady on Nev. He's going full-steam just to hit the right letters to
form recognisable words in the first place, and you want him to make
sense at the same time? "

Nev was having a go at you, and I was trying to point out that with your
minimal intellect, the post you made was probably about as good as you
could manage. I think you should be proud of your efforts, it must have
taken you a while to type all of that! Well done!

 

So what? If they're so old, and have been posted so many times, then are
they really worth wasting even MORE time pointing that out? Surely there
are more important things to be worrying about to that extent? Who gives
a toss if the OP claimed they were from 2007? Big fucking deal.

 

Please provide a quote. I presume you're just throwing any old shit out now.

Michael

 

In the manner I demanded? Oh dear, how silly of me to expect you not to
sidestep and then have a tanty. Try again, here's my post you sidestepped:

"The jokes posted where old and fake. These things are only really funny if
they're true. People pointed out they are old and not true. What is keeping
this conversation going is not these people but people like you who are
arguing about it. While I must admit that people pointing out that jokes are
old is, well, getting old (it's really just a way to big note themselves by
saying they've heard it before), in this case it was only done to point out
the fact that they were invented from previous events. The post did claim to
be from 2007 so I think pointing out that they are old is ok in this case."

Michael

 

It's not important what I think.

Nev..
'07 XB12X

 

Isn't there a bridge that you need to hide under in some fairytale
somewhere ?

 

Erm Nev you've just spent 5 or so posts telling us that it IS .. ?

You didn't provide any quotes saying it was the legal method of making a
point, so we can only surmise that what you espouse above is, actually,
what you think.. and that others should listen.. ergo you must think
what you think is important.

 

You tell 'em Bernd!

 

Feck, you mean we're running the country in here ? Shite .. we've got
some catching up to do..

Erm George .. some of us *work* at computers too .. so "sitting at one
all day when supposed to be working" is .. actually .. *working*.

I also have my doubts that Damien's post has the intent you seem to have
implied from it.

 

"It's life Jim, but not as we know it"
"One small step for man .."
"Houston we have a problem.."

I'm sure nobody minds me getting the years wrong ..

 

In that order once, no. Twice ? Definitely not.

As for over it, I was, and before you posted

And OK so you know I have, I'm pissing off down the shops in about 5
minutes ..

 

You are not working when you are reading and making comments on newsgroups

 

\

Theo, you are a wanker, always have been and always will be

 

You JT are a wanker also, join Theo in his little cubicle

 

So you are saying that jokes should nt be posted on any group other than
alt.jokes??
Go tell that to the thousands who post jokes every day