I believe I'll avoid Michigan...

Discussion in 'Texas Bikers' started by Brian Walker, Jan 20, 2007.

  1. Brian Walker

    Brian Walker Guest

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070118/lf_afp/usjusticesexoffbeat_070118055859

    DETROIT, United States (AFP) - Philanderers beware: spouses caught
    cheating in Michigan could end up spending the rest of their life in
    prison.

    And not the emotional kind.

    The state's appeals court recently ruled that extramarital flings can
    be prosecuted as first-degree criminal sexual conduct, a felony
    punishable by up to life in jail.

    "We cannot help but question whether the Legislature actually intended
    the result we reach here today," Judge William Murphy wrote in a
    unanimous Court of Appeals panel, "but we are curtailed by the language
    of the statute from reaching any other conclusion."

    "Technically," he added, "any time a person engages in sexual
    penetration in an adulterous relationship, he or she is guilty of CSC
    I," the most serious sexual assault charge in the state's criminal
    code.

    Michigan still lists adultery as a felony, although no one has been
    convicted of the offense since 1971.

    Nobody really expects prosecutors to go after cheating spouses. But the
    ruling has the local legal community twittering about its genuine
    intended target.

    One theory floating around the courthouse is that the judges were
    taking a jab at the state Supreme Court, which has decreed that judges
    must interpret statutory language adopted by the Legislature literally,
    whatever the consequences.

    Many other states allow judges to reject a literal interpretation if
    they believe it would lead to an absurd result.

    Judge Murphy wrote that he encouraged "the Legislature to take a second
    look at the statutory language if they are troubled by our ruling."

    A spokesman for the attoney general, who publicly admitted to adultery
    in November, declined to say whether they would press for legislative
    amendments to make it clear that only violent felonies involving an
    unwilling victim could trigger a first-degree CSC charge.

    "This is so bizarre that it doesn't even merit a response," Rusty Hill
    said.

    The appeals court decision involved a man convicted of trading
    prescription painkillers for sex.

    In an attempt to increase his jail time, prosecutors used an obscure
    provision of the state's criminal law to charge him with criminal
    sexual conduct, which occurs whenever "sexual penetration occurs under
    circumstances involving the commission of any other felony."
     
    Brian Walker, Jan 20, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Brian Walker

    Vic Guest


    I'm pretty sure that most of the lonely housewives, through-out the fine
    state of Michigan, are all in mourning over your decision to avoid us,
    Brian, lol. I can only imagine how hard it is for you to go through life
    with such a great lack of self control. I don't blame you for not wanting
    to take the chance of 'getting caught' up here though, lol. If you should
    ever change your mind, give me a call and I'll put on the coffee. Good luck
    in the other states you visit, my apologies for the way Michigan legeslators
    have spoiled your fun.

    Regards,

    Vic
     
    Vic, Jan 20, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Brian Walker

    Brian Walker Guest

    I *KNEW* IT!!!
     
    Brian Walker, Jan 21, 2007
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.