How to handle a tank slapper

Discussion in 'Bay Area Bikers' started by Richard Reynolds, Feb 3, 2005.

  1. Richard Reynolds

    TaskMule Guest

    snip
    snip

    Valuable time? That's a joke. I can't imagine the hours you spend spewing
    long winded posts of useless drivel, having nothing to do with origional
    posts.
     
    TaskMule, Feb 5, 2005
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Richard Reynolds

    TaskMule Guest

    snip
    Lol, Your all over the place, and make no sense.
    Front tire slides, it rarely recovers, you get a "lowside"
    Rear tire slides, often recovers, you get tossed. This is a "highside"

    Your posts are full of this crap, and newbies listen to it.
     
    TaskMule, Feb 5, 2005
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Richard Reynolds

    TaskMule Guest

    Who the **** is Chad?
     
    TaskMule, Feb 5, 2005
    #23

  4. I have never highsided by loosing grip on the rear then regaining it...maybe
    you are doing something wrong...
     
    Joey Tribiani, Feb 6, 2005
    #24
  5. posts, even you observed that in a tank slapper, the rider's hands may
    end up off the bars whether he wants them to or not. I think you even
    said something about broken thumbs. Sometimes the wobble settles down
    and sometimes it doesn't, but an attempt by the rider to hang onto the
    bars does not usually have a productive outcome.

    The OP was confused about what a speed wobble (tankslapper) and a speed
    weave are. They are two completely different modes of oscillation. The
    OP referred to seeing a video where the rider was thrown off his
    machine, which recovered and crossed the finish line of the race track.
    He thought that was a speed wobble. It wasn't, it was a high speed
    weave...

    I personally have been thrown off a few motorbikes by speed weave,
    mostly in the dirt, once on asphalt, when I lost front tire traction.
    In such a speed weave, the frequency of the handlebar movement is
    nowhere near as fast as the frequency of the handlebar movement in a
    true speed wobble...

    The rider finds that he is able to hold onto the handlebars until his
    feet get knocked off the footpegs by the amplitude of the rolling and
    yawing motion. When his feet are off the pegs and his body is on one
    side of the motorbike, it's time to let go, he will never bulldog that
    steer, and he can't hang on with his weight flailing around alongside
    the bike...

    The rider then finds himself off to one side of the motorbike, rolling
    like a log, and maybe his motorbike straightens up, maybe it doesn't.
    If he puts his hands out to stop rolling, he will at least sprain his
    wrists...

    That's what happened to me as I log-rolled down a SoCal canyon,
    alternately viewing the sky and the ground, sky and ground, and wishing
    the motion would halt. My motorcycle wasn't badly hurt. It only cost
    about $300 to fix it...
     
    krusty kritter, Feb 6, 2005
    #25
  6. hotrodded? looks like a mostly stock late 90s R1100R with a aftermarket
    muffler and a clipon windscreen. appears to have stock injection. The
    catalytic convertor has been removed, thats more for weight reduction
    rather than performance. It might have a Ohlins shock, I can't tell for
    sure. Tires appear to be standard Metzeler MeZ4's. It has GS style
    hand guards, those are great for keeping your mitts warm in colder
    weather.
     
    John R Pierce, Feb 10, 2005
    #26
  7. Well, oil coolers...

    But yeah, those look bog standard.
     
    Nicholas Weaver, Feb 10, 2005
    #27
  8. OTOH, the convention of "Radiator" for H2O based coolant and "Oil
    Cooler" for the engine oil is well established, as many liquid cooled
    bikes have separate oil coolers.
     
    Nicholas Weaver, Feb 10, 2005
    #28
  9. Completely off-topic, but -- I have your card. Did I get it at
    USENIX Security in DC in '03, or in Stockholm in '01?
     
    Michael Sierchio, Feb 11, 2005
    #29
  10. DC in 03.
     
    Nicholas Weaver, Feb 11, 2005
    #30
  11. the oil coolers sticking out the side? those are totally stock R1100R.
    there's no water cooling on a R bike.

    here's a totally stock dealer loaner, from back in 2000

    http://www.hogranch.com/CoolPix/30Jun00/DSCN6281-half.jpg
    http://www.hogranch.com/CoolPix/30Jun00/DSCN6282-half.jpg
    http://www.hogranch.com/CoolPix/30Jun00/DSCN6285-half.jpg

    note the differences in the exhaust pipe. that was the ONLY thing that
    was visibly non standard other than the windscreen and handgrips. stock
    bike has a big pillow shaped cat under the tranny.
     
    John R Pierce, Feb 11, 2005
    #31
  12. OK, I don't understand this. I thought that the wheel acted as a
    gyroscope, and tended to keep moving in the same direction. What
    really obvious freshman physics fact am I overlooking?

    -Patti
     
    Patti Beadles, Feb 15, 2005
    #32
  13. Sure, there are gyroscopic effects associated with both front and rear
    wheels, especially if they are spinning rapidly and the tire contact
    patches aren't touching the ground...

    Moto-X free-stylers have been showing off for decades now, with their
    crossed-up jumps and rotating the chassis about its center of gravity
    by increasing engine RPM with the throttle or by stepping on the rear
    brake pedal while the bike is off the ground and free to behave as two
    gyroscopes attached to a frame...

    There's a three-finger rule to demonstrate what a gyroscope's rotor
    will do if it is free to precess, but, of course, a motorcycle's wheel
    isn't free to precess if the tire contact patch is touching the
    pavement. That's why we go to all the trouble of employing complicated
    high-$$$ suspension systems and strive to keep our tires in contact
    with the pavement by careful throttle control on rough pavement...

    Here's the three-finger rule as it applies to motorcycles and bicycles.
    (Do not attempt to use three fingers arranged in this manner upon your
    consenting partner, unless he or she is a large bovine or has been
    fisted a lot...)

    Hold your right thumb up and tilted at about 25 degrees to the
    vertical, back toward you (precession vector and steering axis), point
    your index finger away from you, and it will point a little upward
    (torque vector and axis), point your middle finger to the left (spin
    vector and axis). Imagine that the axis of wheel rotation is your
    middle finger, and that the steering axis is your thumb...

    Using your left index finger, push your right index finger so your
    whole hand has to turn to the left, pivoting around the wrist. You'll
    see that your wrist (symbolizing the steering head) has to bend to the
    left, but it *twists* to the right...

    That's a pretty good model of a motorcycle's steering system when the
    front wheel is off the pavement, or just dancing lightly on the surface
    and gets disturbed off to one side...

    When the front tire contact patch is lightly dancing on the pavement,
    the motorbike is about to wobble, and it's weaving all the time
    anyway...

    When the front tire contact patch is in good contact, it is providing a
    restoring force that straightens the steering head up again. When it's
    dancing, there's less restoring force...

    What's that old song? It goes like: the steering head bone is connected
    to the chassis bone and the chassis bone is connected to the swing arm
    bone and the swing arm bone is connected to the rear wheel bone and the
    rear wheel bone gets its act together, at least for an instant...

    When you start out from a dead stop, the rear wheel will fall over to
    the right or the left, but the thrusting of the front tire's contact
    patch immediately stabilizes the machine's forward motion into a slow
    speed weave, where the front tire's path can be seen to weave back and
    forth across the rear tire's path if you ride through a puddle of water
    onto dry pavement and then examine the evidence...

    Almost anybody can hold a bicycle upright and stationary by applying
    appropriate forces to the handlebars. When the bicycle is in motion,
    the trail (or castor effect) in the front tire automatically provides
    thrusts that push the chassis and the rear wheel back into an upright
    position after the rear wheel tries to go off in whatever direction the
    chassis happens to be leaning at the moment...

    And the chassis is *always* leaning one way or the other, you can
    *feel* it as a rhythmic motion around all three axes. If you're riding
    a bike with a front tire that doesn't feel like it's "planted" firmly
    on the pavement, the motion will tend to make you feel a bit uncertain
    about the bike's handling, the machine will tend to wobble and weave
    more than a stable-feeling motorcycle that doesn't make the rider
    nervous...

    Back in the 1960's, when motorcycles had big 19-inch wheels on the
    front and had flexi-flyer steel tube frames, Triumph solved the
    wobbling and weaving problems with "Daytona geometry". Their race bike
    had 32 degrees of rake (!) in the front end, gawdawful large amounts of
    trail, and the steering motion from side to side was limited to only
    about 15 degrees before the steering would hit the stops. Triumph hoped
    to keep their riders from being spit over the handlebars in speed
    wobbles and speed weaves...

    They had terrible hard rubber tires in those days, high-hysteresis
    rubber that damped out wobbles and weaves was only just being invented.
    There wasn't much weight on the front tire contact patch, it was mostly
    on the rear tire, in order to get good traction for acceleration, and
    road racing was mostly a drag race between corners, the riders would
    pray that their brakes would stop them, and then they would tippy-toe
    through the corners like a little old grandma on a moped...

    Nowadays, modern sportbikes run from 23 to 26 degrees of rake and they
    have a lot more weight on the front tire contact patch to keep the
    much-improved front tire planted on the pavement, stabilizing the
    machine...
     
    krusty kritter, Feb 15, 2005
    #33
  14. Thanks for an absolutely wonderful explanation! I'm sure I'm not
    the only person who appreciates your detailed descriptions.

    -Patti
     
    Patti Beadles, Feb 21, 2005
    #34
  15. Richard Reynolds

    muddycat Guest

    Ditto. I saved it to read again as I just got finished with
    Schrodinger's Kittens and I'm still a bit muddled.
     
    muddycat, Feb 21, 2005
    #35
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.