[QUOTE="Wakko"] Very interesting site. The standard for motorcycle helmets lists a figure of 300G's as a rejection point of a helmet during testing. How a guided weight that they use for testing can generate 300G's is a bit suspect. It's only dropped a short distance.[/QUOTE] no shit, and they aint fudging the numbers, it's pure basic physics and there is nothing suspect about it. exponential acceleration is an amazing thing, whether it's a weighted object under test or a human body, the forces are the same and the objects in motion act the same. Indian Larry died from a fall of maybe 9 feet vertical that impacted his head. The chief tech at Orlando BMW fell in the dealership parking lot and was killed earlier this summer in a similar manner; low speed vertical fall, no helmet headfirst onto concrete. When you put all that force on to a small impact area, the effect is tremendous. If i throw a beachball at you, it's no big deal but if i throw a dart at you with the same velocity, it is a big deal because of the force of impact is focused more tightly on the point of the dart. The helmet diffuses the impact energy over a larger area and abosrbs it by distorting itself, just like the beach ball. the brain box is more like an egg, brittle and subject to cracking, and prone to bouncing the contents around. 32 feet per second/per second acceleration in freefall gathers amazing force in a hurry. in the real world that's not counting any additional speed from the vehicle putting you into a horizontal impact against a car, tree, curb, etc. rather than a vertical impact with the ground. that's why people do get serious injuries in the shower and in other types of falls of what would not appear to be dangerous distance. it's not bad if you land on your ass; it is if you land on an unprotected head.