HD Exhaust MOT legal????

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by GarryG, Sep 11, 2004.

  1. GarryG

    GarryG Guest

    First I must say "A friend has a HD".
    He has fitted HD "Screaming Eagle"? straight through pipes.
    The MOT is up soon and the question is ...
    will he need to refit the original, presumably muffled pipes?
    Bit trick as the Manchester agent who did the upgrade did not return his
    original silencers and has now GONE!
    Garry
     
    GarryG, Sep 11, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. GarryG

    platypus Guest

    I'd say try it as is. If it fails, bog stock Sportster mufflers are
    plentiful and cheap, because /every/ fucker replaces them with something
    else. See:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=10458&item=7920248280&rd=1

    for an example. Alternatively, the local club may have a "MOT" set to lend.
     
    platypus, Sep 11, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. GarryG

    AJ Guest

    lend.
    Snip

    Pipes are now legal so long as they do not say "not for road use" or other
    such words. Failing that the local HOG lot may have a tame MOT chap

    AJ
     
    AJ, Sep 11, 2004
    #3

  4. Where did you get this total bollocks from? The Dorling Kindersley Book
    of Motorcycle Fables?
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 11, 2004
    #4
  5. GarryG

    AJ Guest

    Been told it several times even read it some where as well
     
    AJ, Sep 11, 2004
    #5
  6. It's a load of bollocks, like I said.

    So you "were told it"? And "you read it somewhere as well"?

    For ****'s sake.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 11, 2004
    #6
  7. GarryG

    Preston Kemp Guest

    I wouldn't say it's *total* bollocks, but it is somewhat misleading.
    Pipes that are supplied or fitted as original equipment by the
    manufacturer are legal as long as they don't specify 'not for road use'
    or words to that effect. They don't have to be BS stamped. At least
    that's what it says on the poster on the wall in my local MoT station.
     
    Preston Kemp, Sep 11, 2004
    #7
  8. If bike was manufactured after (I think) 1988 (but JP will confirm date)
    the pipes *must* be BS stamped.

    Pipes, or pattern pipes, for bikes made before BS stamping was mandatory
    don't apply. It's not what this twonk was saying.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 12, 2004
    #8
  9. GarryG

    Timo Geusch Guest

    The Older Gentleman was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever:
    I *think* there's an exception or two to this rule as not all grey
    imports have BS stamps on their exhausts...
     
    Timo Geusch, Sep 12, 2004
    #9
  10. GarryG

    Preston Kemp Guest

    I'm sure you're wrong on that one. If they're OEM pipes they don't need
    a BS or E stamp, even on brand new bikes. They just have to be no
    louder than a similar bike with standard exhaust (in the tester's
    opinion).

    In fact thinking about it I vaguely recall reading somewhere that the
    rules changed again recently, & they don't even need to be OEM now,
    just 'no louder than a similar bike...' etc. Maybe I'll Google later if
    I can be arsed. Of course this may be one of those areas where 'MoT
    passable' doesn't mean 'road legal'.
    We can definitely agree on that one. The only criteria for pre-BS
    (1985?) is that they mustn't be 'excessively loud' (plus the usual not
    blowing at joints etc).
     
    Preston Kemp, Sep 12, 2004
    #10
  11. You can choose your friends you know.
    Wow, all that noise with and still dog slow.
    Have a look here:
    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7921905644
    and 'your friend' happily paid good money to and then rode away from
    someone who had just stolen several hundred quid from him?
    I suppose he did, as he had already shelled out 15 grand for a chrome
    tart's handbag.

    --
    ColonelTupperware
    spouting bollocks on Usenet since 1997
    Usenet FAQ at
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/its/services/internetapps/news/news2.shtml
    UPCE FAQ at http://upce.org.uk/
    UKRM FAQ at http://www.ukrm.net/faq/
     
    Colonel Tupperware, Sep 12, 2004
    #11
  12. I'm sure you're wrong on this, too. SWK will be along.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 12, 2004
    #12
  13. GarryG

    Molly Guest


    Most Harley dealers will pass it.
     
    Molly, Sep 12, 2004
    #13
  14. GarryG

    Robbo Guest

    Well on the webshyte
    http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/documents/page/dft_roads_506856.hcsp

    is

    d) Exhausts - on motorcycles first used on or after 1 January 1985 the
    silencer which forms part of the exhaust system must be either:
    (i) that with which the machine was first fitted; or

    (ii) clearly and indelibly marked with :-

    -the relevant BS marking BS AU 193/T2, BS AU 193a, 1990/T2, BS AU 193a,
    1990/T3; or

    -the relevant "e" marking to show compliance with EC Directive 89/235;
    or the relevant "e" marking to show compliance with Chapter 9 of EC
    Directive 97/24; or

    -the name or trade mark of the manufacturer or marked with that
    manufacturer's part number - relating to it.

    The European Community noise limits applicable to new motorcycles first used
    from 1 April 1991 are:

    Motorcycle Category by cm3
    Limits in dB(A)

    Up to and including 80
    77

    Between 80 and 175 (incl.)
    79

    Above 175
    82



    Motorcycles approved to EU Directive 97/24/EC, Chapter 9 will be 2dB(A) less
    than the above figures.


    (Note: the precise regulations for motorcycle exhausts are complex and it is
    recommended that they are studied closely to obtain accurate and complete
    details of the requirements).

    Before buying any replacement parts for systems listed in this section,
    riders should check for the relevant marks, where applicable. These will
    include an "e" mark for EC Directives, an "E" mark for ECE Regulations and
    "BS" for British Standards.

    (Note: amateur motorcycle builders may be exempt from some or all of the
    requirements)
     
    Robbo, Sep 12, 2004
    #14
  15. <snip>

    So AJ was talking bollocks, indeed.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 12, 2004
    #15
  16. GarryG

    Molly Guest

    Why don't you just read the replies posted yesterday.
     
    Molly, Sep 12, 2004
    #16
  17. GarryG

    Pip Guest

    Four superfluous words there, Molly.
     
    Pip, Sep 13, 2004
    #17
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.