Gold Coast Bike Week

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by will_s, Sep 5, 2008.

  1. will_s

    will_s Guest

    Maybe they should retitle it Gold Coast Harley Week .

    Had a good look at the choppers but shouldnt the most important think be
    making the bike rideable ? OK, they can be rode but if I spent that much
    money I would want something that was fun to ride and not damage my kidneys


    btw: some of those promo girls have good paint jobs
     
    will_s, Sep 5, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Agree entirely with you, choppers are only something to be looked at, not
    ridden

    never liked them and probably never will, will.
     
    George W Frost, Sep 5, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. In aus.motorcycles on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:47:26 GMT
    I liked riding the 'Orrible 'Onda Chop.

    OK, it was purely and utterly a posebike as the straight pipes went
    under the block and so cornering was limited, and the sprung seat was
    sprung only in name...

    But as a bike to tool around the city on wearing old denims and a
    Brando jacket and park outside pubs it was perfect.

    It's not the job most people buy a bike for, but so?

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Sep 5, 2008
    #3

  4. Okay, that's a given, but I ride for pleasure, not for pain
     
    George W Frost, Sep 5, 2008
    #4
  5. will_s

    will_s Guest

    The whole point is surely its possible to make a "pose bike" that also is
    fun to ride.
     
    will_s, Sep 6, 2008
    #5
  6. In aus.motorcycles on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:23:09 GMT
    Pain? As long as I avoided major potholes (A thing also advisable on
    the Pantah) and stuck to city streets (A thing also advisable on the
    Baby Beemer) there was no pain involved.

    Except possibly when trying to do cone weaves... But then couldn't do
    them on the Pantah either.

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Sep 6, 2008
    #6
  7. In aus.motorcycles on Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:38:09 +1000
    Where did I say it wasn't fun?

    It was a hoot!

    Sure, it wasn't a sportbiker's idea of fun, but then the Baby Beemer
    was no sportbike either and that was also fun to ride. For a lot of
    the same reasons the chop was.

    Take the blinders off. You'll have more fun in life.

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Sep 6, 2008
    #7
  8. will_s

    atec77 Guest

    Next thin will be claims a buel or your baby doesn't server for fun and
    purpose...
     
    atec77, Sep 6, 2008
    #8
  9. will_s

    will_s Guest

    So just because I dont like a particular style of bike I have blinkers on ?
    jeez, I really must have such a bad time the last week in Surfers and I
    didnt even know it
     
    will_s, Sep 6, 2008
    #9
  10. In aus.motorcycles on Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:44:25 +1000
    If you can't comprehend that a bike that isn't a sportbike can be fun
    to ride you have blinkers on.

    So either be proud of them or remove them.

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Sep 6, 2008
    #10
  11. will_s

    G-S Guest

    I had a Triumph hardtail chopper (38 speed twin frame with altered
    headstem area, T140V motor with magneto, 4 inch over forks, straight
    through pipes, sprung saddle with pillion pad, low sissy bar and coffin
    tank.

    I loved riding around on that and yes it was very very unreliable...
    probably the most unreliable bike I've ever owned and yes it was totally
    not practical.

    But it was one of the most fun bikes to ride I've ever owned :)


    G-S
     
    G-S, Sep 6, 2008
    #11
  12. will_s

    bill_h Guest

    A 38-speed twin-frame Triumph? Must be one of those early Siegfried
    Bettmann Trumpy bicycles!


    Bill :)
     
    bill_h, Sep 6, 2008
    #12
  13. will_s

    atec77 Guest

    I rode a mid 50's sprung hub with a 36>7 girder fork for years . Much
    younger and the seat was more able in those days , I doubt I could make
    distance without back pain and kidney damage these days
     
    atec77, Sep 6, 2008
    #13
  14. will_s

    G-S Guest

    It was a frame from one of these
    http://www.allenmotorsports.com/triumph_speed_twin_1938.htm

    although all that was remaining of the original bike was the frame and
    rear wheel when we started.


    G-S
     
    G-S, Sep 6, 2008
    #14
  15. That sounds like the bike I had and got rid of it because ot was so damn
    uncomfortable too ride
    but the bike was the one that won the Aus TT at Philip Island 130 mph was
    no trouble to it
     
    George W Frost, Sep 7, 2008
    #15
  16. will_s

    will_s Guest

    Well considering that I was the only non Harley bike on our trip and seeing
    how these riders really enjoy riding them as well as the "pose" factor I
    think you have no idea. Actually I wouldnt mind a couple of them for my shed
    :)

    Also had a lot of fun riding a non sportsbike around Australia
    Nothing to remove
     
    will_s, Sep 7, 2008
    #16
  17. It only had first gear?
     
    Kevin Gleeson, Sep 7, 2008
    #17
  18. will_s

    atec77 Guest

    I expect there were a number of them built , it was not in au and was
    during the late 1960's , fitted with a Bonnie head of questionable
    source and some huge cams it did go rather well.
     
    atec77, Sep 7, 2008
    #18
  19. will_s

    bill_h Guest

    bill_h, Sep 7, 2008
    #19
  20. Had you typed this in MS Word with the Office Assistant switched on, the
    offer of help would've read,

    "It would appear you are having a stroke. You should call an ambulance."
     
    IK Laboratories, Sep 7, 2008
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.