Gas with ethanol

Discussion in 'Bay Area Bikers' started by shakeybike, Sep 12, 2005.

  1. shakeybike

    shakeybike Guest

    Can we use gas with alcohol added in our aircooled bike engines?
     
    shakeybike, Sep 12, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. You're quite right. Perhaps people get these weird ideas because Ethanol
    is hygroscopic, and has been known to cause corrosion in fuel system
    components -- esp. on older vehicles which were designed before it became
    a common fuel additive.
     
    Michael Sierchio, Sep 13, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Champ/IRL cars have run on methanol since the stone age. YMMV.

    When you say the heads pitted, where precisely? Water and
    its electrolytes are probably more corrosive than alcohol.
     
    Michael Sierchio, Sep 13, 2005
    #3
  4. shakeybike

    Anvil* Guest

    What is the actual difference between Methanol and Ethanol in application?
    -----
    First up Methanol is toxic and Ethanol is basically grain alcohol but
    denatured (made mildly toxic trying to keep people from drinking it).
    Next is the ratio of air to fuel. Pure ethanol runs about 200% or twice
    as much liquid as regular gas. Methanol runs about 300%. For fixed jet
    (normal carbs) engine the change to adding alcohols (to gasoline) has
    both increased the octane rating (pressure/temperature when detonation
    occurs assuming a correct mixture) and leaned your engine (you need
    more liquid fuel for a given amount of air).

    If you have fuel injection and an oxygen sensor no worries just your
    mileage went down. For us early bike owners we've jetted with bigger
    jets. Now for people with cars and bikes with fixed jets, well if you
    were running rich you might be fine, but otherwise your power is off
    and you find yourself buying supreme to avoid detonation even at 8.5:1
    compression ratios.
     
    Anvil*, Sep 14, 2005
    #4
  5. shakeybike

    kriyamanna Guest

    Interesting articles on that site. I was strolling around Hollywood one
    day and noticed a smaller gas pump with an "out of service" sign
    sitting on a pad by itself, so I was curious and went over to look at
    it. It was a methanol pump! The octane sticker said that it was only
    108 octane though. Maybe it was a blend of a little methanol with a lot
    of gasoline? I dunno. It seems like a few of the major manufacturers
    had "alternative fuels" cars several years ago. and the service
    stations had to supply fuel at certain stations. It was the only
    methanol pump I've ever seen.
     
    kriyamanna, Sep 15, 2005
    #5
  6. shakeybike

    Rich Guest

    Pearson Ford in San Diego has a service station that sells all kinds of
    fuels, including ethanol. Some cars can take it -- if you open your gas
    tank cover and there's a wheat symbol, your car can use it. IIRC, it
    was mostly recent model Ford cars that were ethanol-compatible.

    Rich, Urban Biker
     
    Rich, Sep 15, 2005
    #6
  7. shakeybike

    JB Guest

    IIRC: the biggest problem with alcohols as fuels is they cost so much
    energy to produce and don't store
    energy as effectively as gasoline. (I am not an expert at energy
    management, so I will defer to any
    experts in the group). We tend to think of fuels as energy 'sources'
    because ... well, at the time of
    buring them there are. But they had to be made -which requires
    energy... this includes petroleum:
    it was made by biological and geological processes (ie. biomass getting
    buried and cooked in the
    absence of oxygen). Earth's petroleum reserves contain the results of
    millions of years of
    photosynthesis - and although they are technically 'renewable' we are
    using up the petroleum faster
    than nature makes it.

    Anyway onto alcohols: they can be made by chemical or biologucla
    processess. The latter being better
    because all we have to do is feed some microbes and have them churn out
    fuel. Right? Wrong. The
    food has to be produced (which uses chemicals and energy) and then the
    alcohol has to be extracted.
    Ironically, most comercial fertilizers are made with/from petroleum so -
    it takes oil to grow the corn
    to be used to replace gasoline! If you consider corn ethanol as a
    fuel - the energy to fertilize, grow,
    harvest and transport the corn is considerable - and currently these
    rely heavily on oil!

    OK, let's ignore the growing of the corn: there is a 'free'
    fermentation process - well yeast eat the sugars
    in the corn and produce alcohol. Still, we have to distill the liquid
    to extract ethanol. If we assume the
    left over liquid is 20% ethanol by volume (which is very hard to do in
    mass production) then you have
    to boil 5 gallons of liquid to extract 1 gallon of ethanol (this is a
    best case scenario - 10-20 gallons are
    more likely!) Go to your chem books and see how much energy is rquired
    to boil 1 gallons of water
    (OK, this isn't exactly right but it gives you an idea of how energy
    expensive it is to extract ethanol).
    [Cracking oil is a comparable process, insofar as it requires a bunch of
    heat, but unlike distilling
    alcohol, there are uses for the other petroleum products. No one wants
    the boiled waste water.]

    Now, consider that the energy content in Ethanol is considerable less
    (by this I mean, BTUs/Gallon)
    so you need a bigger gas tank to go as far as with Gasoline. There is
    a reason that Ethanol is not a
    viable fuel today. In fact, there is a reason that the oil execs
    aren't pushing us toward Ethanol fuel!


    Now, if you think alcohol is bad - Hydrogen as a fuel is even worse!!
    It isn't grown by sunlight,
    we have to break apart molecules to make Hydrogen. OTOH: if we're smart
    we break the molecules and
    extract H2 all in one go. If we use solar power to do this, we may be
    able to 'store' solar energy with
    Hydrogen (but remember the amount of sunlight falling on the Earth is
    about 1.3 kW/m^2 - IOW one
    square meter of sunlight, if used 100% efficiently, could power a hair
    dryer. It will take an awfull lot
    of solar cells to collect enough energy to power our cars)

    The problem is the energy content in a scuba tank full of compressed
    Hydrogen (stuff as much
    as you can in there) isn't all that much. Plus, your 'gas tank' weighs
    more than the fuel. (never mind the
    danger of getting into an accident with a flammable compressed gas in
    every car). If you could safely
    store liquid Hydrogen - THEN we'd have a great solution (but that has
    other problems)

    BTW: I found this table on-line. Energy content per kilogram of certain
    fuels

    Net Energy Content
    MJ/kg
    Hydrogen 120
    Methanol 19.95
    Ethanol 26.68
    MTBE 35.18
    Gasoline 42 - 44




    IIRC: 1 MJ = 1,000 BTU = 0.29 kWh = .4 Hp hours
     
    JB, Sep 18, 2005
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.