Front Plates Report

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by Zekt, Oct 24, 2003.

  1. Zekt

    Nev.. Guest

    ....you should have bothered reading all the way to the end of the sentence.

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Oct 24, 2003
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Zekt

    Biggus Guest

    to maintain.. ok, it will cost $940k to maintain. I read it.

    They will make more than that per 1/4 so $940k is worth it to make
    another 2.8 mil
     
    Biggus, Oct 24, 2003
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Zekt

    sharkey Guest

    He's an edificated man, Knobbo!

    -----sharks (Sumer's here and the 'nazzar is sweet ...)
     
    sharkey, Oct 24, 2003
    #23
  4. Zekt

    Nev.. Guest

    OK, you win at playing dumb. I will do all the maths for you.
    The stats quoted in the report show that over a 6 month period (June-Dec
    2001), 1044 photos of unidentified speeding motorcycles were taken which may
    have been identifiable if the bikes had frontal identification.
    So double that to get an annual figure.
    2 * 1044 = 2088 speeding infringements.
    That's 2088 additional speeding infringements which frontal identification
    will reap per year.
    Now assume that each infringement notice is for $200 (the highest non-loss of
    licence speeding fine).
    That is a total of $200 * 2088 = $417,600 in additional fines received.
    Now compare that to the $940,000 annual cost of maintaining frontal
    identification on motorcycles.
    Spot the deficit.

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Oct 24, 2003
    #24
  5. Zekt

    smack Guest

    I don't get it
     
    smack, Oct 24, 2003
    #25
  6. It's good value. (allow me to explain)

    As is, they're losing $417,600.

    With the front plate system in place, they'll be losing $940,000-$417,600=
    $522,400.

    In other words, they'll be pissing $104,800 MORE up against the wall WITH the
    front plate system in place, rather than leaving it as it stands.

    Keep in mind they've already pissed enough money up the wall in doing this
    highly advanced mathamatics. On top of that, $100K buys you lots of ego
    points, as you get to tell the media front plate this and saftey that.

    Media attention is always good value.
     
    John Tserkezis, Oct 24, 2003
    #26
  7. Zekt

    Nev.. Guest

    That's not really correct. The amount of money pissed up against the wall is
    the full $522,400. The $417,600 was never "lost" because there was never any
    infrastructure or method set in place to collect this money. Even Arthur
    Andersen wouldn't dare include that figure in their calculations. :)
    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Oct 24, 2003
    #27
  8. In aus.motorcycles on Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:39:34 +1000
    So there has to be another reason.

    So, how many "fact finding trips" and "seminars" do you reckon
    Transurban (or whoever it is that runs the citylink in Vic) has provided
    for pollies ans senior bureaucrats? How many brown paper bags been left
    on desks?

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Oct 24, 2003
    #28
  9. Yes, but now they're getting the 417 back, where previously, they wouldn't.
    Doesn't matter. "Lost" in media talk counts money you _would_ have, were it
    not for whatever circumtstance. Like when business complain to the media
    they've lost $X million dollars last year, where they in fact were pulling a
    profit the whole time, but looking at their _projected_ profits, they fell
    short by whatever amount.
    He (and others) would and do.

    _Expected_ profits that don't come are just as bad as losing it in the first
    place. They don't just stockpile the money for a rainy day, they spend it (by
    way of a loan) to cater for larger business infrastructure, stock, people etc.
    If the projected profits don't come, they're just as in the shit as they
    would have been if they really did lose it.

    Profits that are unexpeced are not so great, because you have to pay tax on
    that. The problem comes due to the fact that you've not thought of _how_ to
    spend that money yet. This is where the pisssup is due, it spends huge amounts
    of cash over a short period of time, structured as a writeoff, but isn't as
    economical as could have been if they were expecting it.
     
    John Tserkezis, Oct 25, 2003
    #29
  10. Agreed. There's a pollie somewhere getting a kickback somehow.
     
    John Tserkezis, Oct 25, 2003
    #30
  11. Zekt

    Smee Guest


    Nebuchadnezzar went nuts and lived like a wild beast for a few years.
    I can just envision Bracks and howard et al running around the fields
    with the kangaroos.
     
    Smee, Oct 25, 2003
    #31
  12. Zekt

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Hmmm... OK.
    All the public ambivalence will evaporate (and turn into animosity!
     
    Knobdoodle, Oct 25, 2003
    #32
  13. What they gunna use it for? Girl's hockey? Seems to be buggerall live
    stuff going on these days ...

    Cheers



    -------------
    Kevin Gleeson
    Technical Director
    Blue Rocket Productions
    Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
    www.blue-rocket.com.au
     
    Kevin Gleeson, Oct 25, 2003
    #33
  14. Jeez, that¹s a low blow, even for you!

    Hammo
     
    Hamish Alker-Jones, Oct 26, 2003
    #34
  15. Zekt

    Theo Bekkers Guest

    Dammit! Biggus always wins.

    Theo
     
    Theo Bekkers, Oct 27, 2003
    #35
  16. Zekt

    Biggus Guest

    How is profit playing dumb?
     
    Biggus, Oct 27, 2003
    #36
  17. Zekt

    Zekt Guest

    How about 3MTA3.... if they were going to do the front plate thing
    I was gonna get personalised plates with that one it cause the front
    of the fazer's screen is high enough to see in rear view mirrors...

    J
     
    Zekt, Oct 27, 2003
    #37
  18. James Mayfield said....

    JM> We all find an appropriate spot on the front of our bike, text to read
    JM> something like "**** off speed cameras." or "Fine Free Zone" or something
    JM> like that. Then, when we go through the revenue cameras at revenue
    JM> generating velocity, at least someone, somewhere, will get an eyeful of
    JM> exactly what we think of their ideas.

    And which further enforces the views of non-riders that we're
    irresponsible hoons who need be be reined in with a tight leash...
     
    Martin Taylor, Oct 27, 2003
    #38
  19. Zebee Johnstone said....

    ZJ> So, how many "fact finding trips" and "seminars" do you reckon
    ZJ> Transurban (or whoever it is that runs the citylink in Vic) has provided
    ZJ> for pollies ans senior bureaucrats? How many brown paper bags been left
    ZJ> on desks?

    Oi! That sort of thing doesn't 'appen 'ere in Victoria. Just ask the
    former members of the Victoria Police Drug Squad...
     
    Martin Taylor, Oct 27, 2003
    #39
  20. Zekt

    Matt Palmer Guest

    Morgan Vening is of the opinion:
    I'll add another one - doesn't cause any permanent damage to the bike (such
    as making you drill holes in the front mudguard or fairing somewhere).

    Basically, it ain't gonna happen for too many modern bikes. But yeah, if it
    didn't require me to fork out a pile or wreck my bike (like you'd notice
    some more damage anyway <g>) I wouldn't mind it particularly. It's not like
    I go through speed cameras at high speed at present anyway.

    - Matt
     
    Matt Palmer, Oct 28, 2003
    #40
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.