French Run - posted on behalf of TOG

(SteveH) wrote in message

No.

The happiness of employees is a prerequisite to consistently
outperforming your competition.

Consequently the happiness of employees is important to ensure that the
business is competitive.

If employees could deliver when unhappy do you really think the company
would give a ****?

 

Does your senior management realise they've got a hotbed of Marxist
insurrection fomenting away in the bad end of Welsh Wales?

--
Platypus - (unreal)
VN800 Drifter, R80RT, Z200
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15

 

I'm wondering if he's basing it on the amount he's being charged on the
amount he's being charged on his current house sale/purchase.

 

So how come so many companies go so far out of the way to piss the employees
off?
..
..
..
I know the answer of course.

 

They don't call us the 'Valleys Mafia' for nothing, you know ;-)

 

(SteveH) wrote in message

You work in the veg section then?

 

(SteveH) wrote in message

Bloodsucking scum that provide the capital to run your business. Look
at the balance sheet, look at the entry that says "shareholder funds"
and think what this actually means.

 

More like basing it on the P&L statements I look at every month.

Corperate lawyers wipe out the profit generated by large clusters of
stores. What do they actually contribute to the business - **** all!

It's a self-funding industry. If no-one had corportate lawyers, then
there wouldn't be any of the legal wrangling that supposedly goes on.

It's a bloody conspiracy, I tell you......

 

Your shelf stackers get paid not much less than what I used to pay my
staff, and I know who did the more important job.

 

Shareholders are good. They don't charge regular interest. You loose <> they
loose. It's the Muslim way of business is it not? How we regulate it is
shite of course.

 

I look at the balance sheet and see some right Icelandic [1] **** as the
major shareholder.

[1] no, seriously.

 

*respect*

 

The shareholders *own* the company - you do know what shares are?

Keeping the employees happy is one strategy for maximising the shareholders'
ROI, in that happy employees work better. Your lot seem to have conned
their employees into also doing it for less than the going rate, which is a
bloody good trick. They're to be congratulated...

--
Platypus - (unreal)
VN800 Drifter, R80RT, Z200
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15

 

SteveH wrote

The shareholders bring capital to the business. They are essential to
capitalism. Without them there would be no capital top get ismistic
about. It is the banks who are the bloodsucking scum.

 

My guess would be it's cheaper than redundancy and management are crap.

I had a converstation with a Senior Manager in Securicor once, close to
20 years ago which went along the lines of:

"We don't want to make the job too easy. If we make it hard then it
encourages all the weak people to leave".

I thought, because I was respectful at the time and asked...

"Wouldn't it encourage the strong people to leave first since they could
more easily get another job?"

The response:

"no, the crap people leave first".

Pretty much like Nigel Tufnel talking about his amp going to 11.

 

(SteveH) wrote in message

What the **** does his nationality have to do with anything.

Are you sure you're not a racist? 'cos you're certainly sounding like
one.

 

It's the point of values schemes; chuck the sheep a line..

"we value our staff above all else"


"Baaaah-Baaaaah-Baaah"

 

You say it like it's a bad thing?

 

I don't think I made any judgement in that post. Just a question and a
suggestion.

 

That'll be a *whoosh*, then.