It's all down to seniority. Some of you may remember Barry, the Aussie pilot who lived in our village here, who worked for CrossAir before it took over SwissAir and formed Swiss. He was paid something in the order of 50 grand sterling, IIRC, but he and most of his fellow Crossair pilots were made redundant, based on Last In, First Out, whereas the more senior Swissair pilots, some of whom were allegedly earning twice that, were all kept on. Of course, the more senior ones would also be the ones most likely to be certified for the big planes like 747s, which he wasn't, so I suppose there's some logic in paying them more. Mine dew, they mostly pay virtually no tax and have next to zero day-to-day living expenses, so they're not exactly paupers even on the lower rates. -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) \`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3 (slightly broken, currently missing) `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `
Does the main body gear on a 747 have the option to steer into alignment with the runway on landing in cross winds or do they still have to "Kick off drift". I know later 747 can steer their main gear for taxiing in tight places.
Err, why would it do that in Honk Kong but not in Hounslow [1]?? [1] Or indeed anywhere else on the Heathrow approach.
Although I read, a while ago, that the island won't actually last that long [1] and was sinking. Do you know what they've done with the old Kai Tak site? [1] IIRC, something like only 20 years.
Well they are contemplating opening up the second runway at Chep Lap Kok so I hope it isn't sinking. An Expo style exhibition centre has also opened a short distance from the airport terminal as well. In terms of Kai Tak the area remains undeveloped. There are huge rows raging in HK as to how it will be developed and for what purpose. An ocean liner terminal is one idea but the usual skyscraper office and retail type development has also been proposed. However the surrounding area is very poor (in HK terms) with poor housing and there is much pressure to secure improved social housing and beneficial development that will bring opportunity to the locals. The final issue is the raging environmental debate in HK - there is much resistance to anything that will further reduce the size of the harbour as there has been continual reclamation for decades. There is also a concern about the loss of the view out into the harbour. There are now very few places where you can look out from land and on to the harbour - everywhere else just has huge buildings in the way. Kai Tak was a low rise building and therefore there is a view there. Given the relatively poor performance of the HK legislature (and the Chief Executive) I can't see the Kai Tak development issue being settled anytime soon.
Now there's something I wish I had done - fly into Kai Tak on Concorde. Still the French are trying to get Concorde flying again so I might still be able to take a flight sometime.
There was a feature on the news. The French Concordes are regularly checked over and maintained as if they will be in the air soon even though they are in museums. The BA ones are languishing in a museum. As is so often the case Air France seem to be keen on trying to fly them again while there is no such official interest here. There is obvious interest from enthusiasts on both sides of the Channel. As we have Mr Irish Axe Man in charge of BA I don't see BA making any moves to resuscitate their old fleet.
Have you neither been to HK nor seen the video posted up there ^^^? Incoming planes don't generally get within a hunmdred feet or so of Hounslow rooves. They're still higher above any buildings when they come over the BA buildings[1] on the perimeter next to Hatton's X than they are at HK. [1] Worked there for a while some years back. Noisy, it was. -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) \`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3 (slightly broken, currently missing) `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `
ITYM rotting. The one I went on is on the NY barge. I've not forgiven BA for an act of utter hooliganism. Ali
Aircraft on approach are throttled back - it's on departure when they get noisy. Unless it's a Harrier of course.
IIRC the gear is locked in the straight on position for landing. The use one hell of a big steering damper on the front though
They were not allowed to. When the government sold them to BA for £1 each, because of the fuss the other airlines made, a bill was passed in parliament covering the £1 each sale, that if BA didn't want then anymore another airline could buy them for £1 each. Which is what pissed of Branston when he offered to buy the fleet. The government broke their own rules.
More to the point is the fact that Concorde had passed it's sell by date and was ready for retirement when they decided to stop using it. It was a wonderful piece of engineering in its time but things move on and the best place for it is in people memories. I can remember being taken out of a school class to watch it flying over north Bedfordshire when it was still being tested prior to being put into service and being told that it was the pinnacle of aircraft technology. Not any more. I've worked in the aircraft industry at the design stage and Concorde would be thrown out and laughed at if someone suggested building it now. Cost to build, cost to operate, noise levels and fuel costs make it nothing more than a joke.
Yes I did see the video. And the planes don't look that much closer than they do to me in some parts of W London/Staines etc esp when they take off towards London.
Andy Bonwick wrote Not that much of a joke as it has still(??) more logged supersonic hours than all the worlds military aircraft put together and we continue to make money using/selling the knowledge gained from this.