FOAK: Volume

Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote

I, along with millions of others, am having issues with seti@home/boinc.
it's me own fault for upgrading to 4.05 apparently.

 

Ah- I was plannaing to go over to BOINC this weekend. Would I be better
off delaying it a while?

--
<8P Wizard
Suzuki GS550 "I like that. Nicely shite" - TOG
Golf GTi 16v
ANORAK#17b BOMB#19 BOTAFOT#138 BREast#5 COFF#24
COSOC#8 DFV#11 STG#1

 

Well, I trust the good folks from FSF...

olsonm@debian:~$ bc
bc 1.06
Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
For details type `warranty'.
warranty

bc 1.06
Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License , or
(at your option) any later version.

This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.

You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, write to

The Free Software Foundation, Inc.
59 Temple Place, Suite 330
Boston, MA 02111, USA.

 

Wizard wrote

Yes and no. If you can actually find out where they are hiding the
working pages for downloads for 4.08, it is claimed to be fixed. If not
then the advice is to stay well away from it.[1] On a windows box
anyway, I don't know about *nix


[1] 4.0[3..5]. It just brings your machine to a grinding halt in about
three minutes leaving ctrl-alt-del as the only way out.

 

What's a bute?

 

It's a plaice in Scotland.

 

How disappointing. I was hoping it was some kind of measurement of
the quality of porn.