FOAK - canals

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004.

  1. flashgorman

    flashgorman Guest

    In between jumping into canals, I've been pondering about towpaths. Most
    canals, and all the ones around here, only have a towpath on one side. This
    begs the question of how, in the days of horse drawn boats, did they pass
    each other? I suppose you could slacken off the ropes on one boat, lifting
    them up and letting the other boat pass underneath - but it seems like a
    lot of trouble, especially if the canal is busy. Maybe there used to be a
    path on each side but it doesn't look like there was and there certainly
    isn't under any of the bridges.

    Any one know and/or care?
     
    flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    Err, that's exactly what they used to do. Lift the rope that is. Some
    busy sections of canal have towpaths either side, but not many. Even
    at their peak, the canals weren't ever so busy that it became
    impractical to pass other barges by simply lifting the rope on one
    barge. Think how many boats you can get through a lock in an hour and
    there's your peak usage.

    ISTR (from some canal museum school trip thing when I was about 10)
    that some barges have a pivoted mast to lift the rope and facilitate
    this process, but that was nearly 30 years ago so ICBW.
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. flashgorman

    flashgorman Guest

    How disappointing, I was hoping for something elaborate involving swiming
    horses or really tall horses going one way and shetland ponies going the
    other.
     
    flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004
    #3
  4. flashgorman

    simonk Guest

    I know, but don't particularly care

    Turnover bridges:
    http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/articles/Pendeford/Canals.htm

    The bridge is smoothly contoured so as not to snag the rope. The towpath
    climbs gradually up one side of the bridge, across the canal, then back down
    the other side and under the arch. Provided the horse is far enough in
    front of the barge the rope doesn't need to be unhitched
     
    simonk, Aug 2, 2004
    #4
  5. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    You're the aspiring comedy writer, why don't you just make some funny
    shit up and then post a reply to yourself?

    FWIW, the I'd go with the Shetland/Shire Horse rather than the Sea
    Horses. Remember, good comedy has to be believable.

    HTH
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #5
  6. flashgorman wrote
    Yes/no.
     
    steve auvache, Aug 2, 2004
    #6
  7. flashgorman

    Vass Guest

    i remember fishing was good under the bridges at our local canal [1]
    mostly when raining as the fish were under the bridge keeping dry.

    [1] Grantham canal

    Vass
     
    Vass, Aug 2, 2004
    #7
  8. flashgorman

    Eddie Guest

    That's for negotiating junctions, not for passing other boats.
     
    Eddie, Aug 2, 2004
    #8
  9. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    How do the Shetland pony powered barges _full_of_Shire_horses_ get
    under the rope of the approaching Shire Horse-powered barges full of
    Shetlands? Eh?
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #9
  10. flashgorman

    Ace Guest

    Clearly the shire horse barges must run along the deeper side of the
    canal.
     
    Ace, Aug 2, 2004
    #10
  11. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    I can't see all of Simon's post so he may have covered it, but there
    are also bridges built in two halves, with a little (rope-width) gap
    in the middle. Cunning geezers them Victorians.
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #11
  12. flashgorman

    flashgorman Guest

    What about some shetland ponies delivering a cargo of giraffes?
     
    flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004
    #12
  13. flashgorman

    Ace Guest

    Submarine barge, obviously.
     
    Ace, Aug 2, 2004
    #13
  14. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    Nah, flat-packed giraffes. Explains why canal barges are so long.
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #14
  15. flashgorman

    Ace Guest

    You've never wondered what a periscope was _really_ for?
     
    Ace, Aug 2, 2004
    #15
  16. flashgorman

    flashgorman Guest

    Knowing a little about the depth of canals, I don't think that your
    suggestion would float. Giraffes would also make bridges a bit tricky
    without a lot of synconised ducking.
     
    flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004
    #16
  17. flashgorman

    HooDooWitch Guest

    For the Jolly Roger?
     
    HooDooWitch, Aug 2, 2004
    #17
  18. flashgorman

    Champ Guest

    Who on earth would be stupid enough to transport ducks by barge?
     
    Champ, Aug 2, 2004
    #18
  19. flashgorman

    flashgorman Guest

    It was common practice to transport racing ducks by barge in order for them
    to arrive refreshed. They used to relax on small seats, known as ducking
    stools.
     
    flashgorman, Aug 2, 2004
    #19
  20. flashgorman

    sweller Guest

    On many canals there are little ramps every so often to help horses
    who've fallen in get out.
     
    sweller, Aug 2, 2004
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.