court

It'd be worth the train fare for me too. And I'd be able to have a drink
on the way back.

 

So would I, if I stopped for a pint at the Black Horse..

 

/a/ pint?

 

ok, thanks to Veggie you can now all see how badly we were riding.

http://www.asom24.dsl.pipex.com/index.htm

theres a full version (11.8mb) and a pikey bandwidth version (2mb).

JP / Stu, is there any point in pleading not guilty?

TIA.
--
Adie - capable of leading darsy astray
(replace spam with nickname to reply)

Triumph T595 (for Sale) / GSF600 bandit
MRO#11 BOTAFOF#7 BOTAFOT#130 DIAABTCOD#17 MIB#24 YTC#16 BOB#15 ex-UKRMMA#22

 

Oh no we can't...

 

bugger.

try

pikey version... http://www.asom24.dsl.pipex.com/yourenicked-bp.wmv
(2mb)

non pikey version... http://www.asom24.dsl.pipex.com/yourenicked.wmv
(11.8mb)
--
Adie - capable of leading darsy astray
(replace spam with nickname to reply)

Triumph T595 (for Sale) / GSF600 bandit
MRO#11 BOTAFOF#7 BOTAFOT#130 DIAABTCOD#17 MIB#24 YTC#16 BOB#15 ex-UKRMMA#22

 

I'm more of a timid rider than you two and, while I'm happy to
undertake at three figure speeds if there's plenty of escape room, I
would not normally go between cars (as darsy does in the first
undertake and you pretty much do in the second) at that sort of speed.

I'm not saying any of us are right or wrong, but if I can draw a
distinction as above then maybe a magistrate will too.

 

Previously on ukrm, Adrienne M Jenn said...

Those coppers sound like a couple of proper clueless cunts.

 

Page not found

The page you are trying to get to was not found at this address.

 

Delete the "proper clueless" bit IMO. But that goes for all of them.

 

....and that concludes the case for the defence.

--
| ___ Salad Dodger
|/ \
_/_____\_ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/KH500A8/TS250C
|_\_____/_| ..62743../..14719.../..3157./.19406
(>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 PM#5
|__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 WG*
\ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4
\|^|/ ANORAK#17
'^'

 

Brevity rocks.

 

Has to be worth the £500 for his time....

 

I'd be happy to pay double that too but he's far too busy for me to
even consider asking.

--
Adie - capable of leading darsy astray
(replace spam with nickname to reply)

Triumph T595 (for Sale) / GSF600 bandit
MRO#11 BOTAFOF#7 BOTAFOT#130 DIAABTCOD#17 MIB#24 YTC#16 BOB#15 ex-UKRMMA#22

 

I just downloaded the full version.

 

As I understand it, the "guilty to speeding, not guilty to due care" was a
strategy to tempt the CPS into going for the quick win on speeding and
dropping the other charge. As they haven't taken that bait, the strategy
has failed and you need to come up with an new plan. I'm afraid bending
over appears to be the lesser of two evils here.

 

<pauses for thought>

Hmmm - you could be right, but I'd need to be in a hurry.

 

I tend to agree most drivers would consider that move a lack of Due Care
though I do the same all the time. I jump sometimes myself in the cage when
bikes come by so.
Must do it at far greater speed such that capture is not an option.

Indeed

 

Deffo not IMHO.
I would be looking for a stay to recruit expert witnesses. CPS are not daft,
they can take the game of bluff to the wall too.

Trouble is the dynamic duo have not made the moves and noises to suggest
they are really serious about fighting it. It's a game and battle rules
apply.

 

Pardon? Personally I wouldn't recommend a change of plea simply on the
grounds they are /not/ guilty IMO. But...

It would only be sub judice if either Stu or JP were directly involved or
likely to be involved.

As to contempt I'm not sure where you're coming from. It would certainly
be in order to change a plea "in light of the video evidence".

My view, however, would be in light of the video evidence "get your
fucking plod recruitment policies sorted, wankers"

Although I suspect that may be considered contemptuous.