computers and racing/off topic, FWIW

Discussion in 'Motorcycle Racing' started by T3, Sep 8, 2004.

  1. T3

    T3 Guest

    http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-5347581.html?tag=header.newsfeed

    An interesting interview with Dieter Gundel, offers a little insight about
    the racing electronics associated with Ferrari's effort. Off topic but
    illustrates how advanced they(F-1) are compared to any MGP effort. On the
    other hand, a reboot in the middle of a 150mph corner might give new meaning
    to the term crash....
    Regards,
    T3
     
    T3, Sep 8, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. T3

    Andrew Guest

    We had Danica Patrick of Toyota Atlantic fame come to work one day to show
    us how her team uses our products to integrate everything.

    http://www.danica-patrick.com/

    http://www.toyotaatlantic.com/Driver.asp?ID=376
     
    Andrew, Sep 10, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. I don't think the MotoGP teams are that far away. There are some things
    you just can't do on a bike, like traction control, yet.
     
    Jiann-Ming Su, Sep 11, 2004
    #3
  4. T3

    Andrew Guest

    According to some article I read recently, the major problem that must be
    solved comes from the cooling system.
    You cannot have that big radiator out front and not have problems sucking
    air through it at 200mph. The boundry layer sticks to the radiator like
    glue; therefore not allowing for proper cooling.
    They have solved this issue in Formula 1 with ground effects and being able
    to place the radiators where they can get cleaner air. Besides Benelli, I
    don't know who has experimented with placing the radiator elsewhere than out
    front (yes, I know about the Honda side mounted radiators, but when you get
    the HRC Kit for the RC45, RC51, etc., you get a big ole radiator out front.)
    When they get this figured out they will be able to break through to much
    higher speeds.
     
    Andrew, Sep 11, 2004
    #4
  5. T3

    pablo Guest

    Current clutch technology -to avoid downshift issues- could be seen as an
    instance of traction control where it affects motorcycles most negatively.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Sep 11, 2004
    #5
  6. T3

    Jules Guest

    I don't think the MotoGP teams are that far away. There are some things
    I'm sure they have (or had) traction control.. They even have (had?)
    launch control.

    Not sure what the regulations state in '04 but the backfiring noises I
    heard particularly from Biaggi's Yamaha in '02 when I went to Phillip
    Island were surely nothing other than traction control!
     
    Jules, Sep 11, 2004
    #6
  7. Nobody doubts the existence of traction control, it's more about how they do
    it and how effextive they've made it and/or want it. Will a GP bike be
    faster without _any_ spin? How do they avoid fatal "double action" through
    both rider and electonic input?
    ......

    /MBE
     
    Morten Becker-Eriksen, Sep 12, 2004
    #7
  8. T3

    inline_four Guest

    Check out Tularis (http://cycleshark.com/Project_Tularis/project_tularis.html,
    http://www.visi.com/~moperfserv/tularis.htm). It's Dr. Robin Tuluie's
    second bike. I forget how the first one had the radiator, but Tularis
    has an underseat radiator design, where the engine slows the air flow
    and makes the air pass through the radiator at a more optimum rate.
    In theory that increases cooling efficiency and improves aeros. They
    already have a bunch of track records to back up what they're talking
    about.
     
    inline_four, Sep 14, 2004
    #8
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.