Come on, England !!!

*If* you knew waht it meant, why did you use it in that situation?
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 75 TS 156 TS S2
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

Simple. I had shown what I set out to demonstrate which was that you
won't "fail just about any driving test for doing 40 in a 60"

Perhaps you didn't know that it is the standard ending to a proof - or
perhaps you were wondering what quantum electrodynamics had to do with it.

So what did you think I meant?

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

 

Bloody hell. Another one that can't read English.
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 75 TS 156 TS S2
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

Seems to be a post without a point?
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 75 TS 156 TS S2
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

No you didn't


--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 75 TS 156 TS S2
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

<snip>

Answer the original question. Go on.

 

I say, this John chappie really needs a JCB rather than a shovel, the
holes he manages to dig for himself.

Oh, and a book on how to write coherent English. And a treatise on
snipping sigs.

 

Exactly what you said above. The previous posting said that trucks were
restricted to 40 in 60 limits, and you omitted the dual carriageway
proviso. You had to resort to the official website to get it right, but
you got there eventually.

 

Nor logic. Nor maths. Nor English.

 

Ooooh, a newbie!

 

"When fuckwits collide!"

 

*Nice*

 

You mean *certainly*, and thus all your rantings have been rendered
invalid. You goofed. Again.

 

<sigh>

Ali

 

You and me both, old son - but you are sooooo young compared to me!

Ali

 

That's the second time you've said that to someone. Perhaps it's you
who has the difficulty.

 

Are you here for the 5 min argument or the full half hour?


--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

 

Ah a nitpicker. Would you like to point out grammar and punctuation
errors as well as my failure to also note that the rules were different
outside the UK

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

 

Are you doing a little arthritic dance round your living room?

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

 

The point is to explain why prefacing a statement with *assuming
conditions are suitable* is a huge assumption, which you failed to
comprehend.