Cable or Hydraulic Clutch

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by rricciardi, May 22, 2005.

  1. How kind of you, sir...

    The original poster cross posted his enquiry to rec.motorcycles.harley
    and rec.motorcycles.tech and never responded to any message of
    advice...

    Given the argumentative nature of the owners of certain brands of
    motorsickles, the thread could live forever, it might grow to hundreds
    of messages in length as the trolls and flamers and users who are weeks
    behind in their important task of monitoring all their Usenet NG's try
    to catch up with short sarcastic remarks...
     
    krusty kritter, May 24, 2005
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. How kind of you, sir...

    The original poster cross posted his enquiry to rec.motorcycles.harley
    and rec.motorcycles.tech and never responded to any message of
    advice...


    Given the argumentative nature of the owners of certain brands of
    motorsickles, the thread could live forever, it might grow to hundreds
    of messages in length as the trolls and flamers and users who are weeks
    behind in their important task of monitoring all their Usenet NG's try
    to catch up with short sarcastic remarks...
     
    krusty kritter, May 24, 2005
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. rricciardi

    Sparkle Guest

    I never advised using either cable or hydraulic.
    Krusty will never backup his claim that "Hydraulic clutches have better
    pressure ratios, that's why they are used on a lot of motorbikes..."

    He can only drone on with repetitive descriptions of small master
    cylinders and large slave cylinders. If you're impressed by that, so be it!
     
    Sparkle, May 25, 2005
    #23
  4. rricciardi

    John Johnson Guest

    Perhaps this is a rash assumption, but isn't it the case that varying
    the pressure ratio in a cable clutch requires changing the radius of a
    rotating arm while changing the ratio in a hydraulic system requires
    changing the diameter of a piston? If this is the case, then it seems
    like the hydraulic system would be more flexible in choice of ratios
    because a large-diameter piston is not particularly constrained by
    engine-size limits while a large-radius throwout arm might very well be.

    If I'm misunderstanding things I'm sure someone here will set me
    straight.
     
    John Johnson, May 25, 2005
    #24
  5. rricciardi

    Sparkle Guest

    Pistons, arms, ball-&-ramps, they're all junk.

    rricciardi should use a system of compound pulleys.
     
    Sparkle, May 26, 2005
    #25
  6. rricciardi

    rricciardi Guest

    Sorry Everyone but I was out ot town and not able to connect to check
    my replies. Thanks for all the input.
    I am leaning towards hydraulic cause I am planning on running the line
    inside the frame for a cleaner look. I just want to make sure that I
    don't sacrafice function for a clean look.
     
    rricciardi, May 28, 2005
    #26
  7. rricciardi

    rricciardi Guest

    Sorry Everyone but I was out ot town and not able to connect to check
    my replies. Thanks for all the input.
    I am leaning towards hydraulic cause I am planning on running the line
    inside the frame for a cleaner look. I just want to make sure that I
    don't sacrafice function for a clean look.
     
    rricciardi, May 28, 2005
    #27
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.