Bye Bye Donald

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Paul Corfield, Nov 8, 2006.

  1. Paul Corfield

    Charlie Guest

    Yebbut, isn't the very point that the terrorists don't need and, more
    dangerously, realise that they don't need advanced weapons? We are faced
    with the possibility of decades of low-level, random, decentralised,
    fanatical, imaginative, varied, reckless and ruthless acts of indiscriminate
    violence, each of which could be effected by individuals or tiny handfuls of
    crazies drawn from a pool of hundreds of millions of angry co-religionists.
    Makes 'our' job of keeping an eye on a relative handful of Irish
    protection-racketeers [on BOTH sides] masquerading as principled
    revolutionaries, and only more or less successfully even when we speak the
    same language as them, seem like an absolute doddle by comparison.
    Hmmm. Walking Corpse Reagan drives the already creaking budget into a
    massive deficit, spending the USSR into oblivion [okay, at least two cheers
    for that]. Daddy Bush increases the deficit, but at least he has the sense
    to get 'his' Iraq war funded by the Saudis even though he leaves the job
    unfinished. Shagger Clinton presides over a period of stability and
    prudence, despite the debilitating and undermining effects of impeachment
    and so on, leaving office with the budget in surplus decades ahead of all
    forecasts. Knucklehead Evangelist Bush squanders it all over again, with
    estimates running out to $400+bn for fiscal 2006.

    US economy woes are a direct consequence of them nurtuing the cuckoo in
    their nest, by cosying up to China. China has underwritten the alarming
    deficit, by buying US bonds, just as the Japanese were persuaded to do in
    the 80s. Trouble is, the Chinese will be rather more muscular and
    unfriendly 'bailiffs' when the time comes.
     
    Charlie, Nov 10, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. Indeed.

    Now - about the question that I asked - is a furtive blowjob worse than
    involving ones country in an unwinnable war under false pretenses?

    Phil
     
    Phil Launchbury, Nov 10, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. "Sins of omission or commission"..

    Phil
     
    Phil Launchbury, Nov 10, 2006
  4. You snort white powder?

    Ali
     
    Alison Hopkins, Nov 10, 2006
  5. Paul Corfield

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    I can tell you that Playa Del Ingles was crap when I went there. Too
    many cunts trying to grab your arm as you walk past and not enough of
    them willing to take any notice of friendly warnings until you ram a
    half eaten burger in their face and tell them to **** off or face the
    consequences.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Nov 10, 2006
  6. I agree with you on that, mostly. Clinton, when being given a hard time
    by that odious creep Starr, on the Lewinsky blowjob, should have simply
    declined to reply on the grounds that a gentleman does not discuss such
    things.

    Would have put Starr nicely in his place and shown him up for what an
    utterly repellant individual he is.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Nov 10, 2006
  7. He might have declined to discuss a lady's honour. Except a lady would have
    had the damn dress dry cleaned, not deep frozen.
    Quite. I still like the French response of utter incomprehension that there
    might be a problem. And the Chinese puzzlement that a fellow might not have
    a concubine.

    Ali
     
    Alison Hopkins, Nov 10, 2006
  8. Yes, that would have been part of it.
    There's the rub, imo. Was Lewinski a White House groupie and simply
    keeping it as a souvenir or was it for the more sinister purpose of
    evidence.

    I incline to the former, but istr she blabbed to a pal who urged her to
    keep it.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Nov 10, 2006
  9. I would broadly agree but there is a fine line here.
    I didn't really care about this. Sex, politics and power are
    inextricably intertwined and the electorate would be stupid to imagine
    otherwise.
    I don't really care about this except if the MP in question (any MP that
    is) has taken an utterly hypocritical stance on morality or has lied for
    months about something like this. If they are caught out and own up and
    apologise then I really don't care what else the papers or anyone else
    may say. When the papers go into "witch hunt" mode then I tend to side
    more with the accused than the self appointed accusers.
    This is a simple matter of integrity and trust and I agree that
    backhanders like this are a complete no no.
     
    Paul Corfield, Nov 10, 2006
  10. You cannot seriously believe what you have just written.
    Oh so Mr Bush's tax cuts and associated budget deficit are the cause of
    this impending disaster then?
     
    Paul Corfield, Nov 10, 2006
  11. Paul Corfield

    Owen Guest

    And we will doubtless reep the consiquences... God forbid...
     
    Owen, Nov 10, 2006
  12. Paul Corfield

    Owen Guest

    Especially when Clinton managed to bring the US of A back into the
    black...
     
    Owen, Nov 10, 2006
  13. Paul Corfield

    Owen Guest

    Ffs, do you really think he has helped matters?
     
    Owen, Nov 10, 2006
  14. Paul Corfield

    Owen Guest

    Um, "good intelligence gathering"... Anything strike you as standing
    out here? Fucking outrageous really...
     
    Owen, Nov 10, 2006
  15. Paul Corfield

    Owen Guest

    Fair points, I stand corrected on the matter of the self-important
    jumped up little prick of a dickhead president... Not that I have a
    axe to grind...
     
    Owen, Nov 10, 2006
  16. Gets my vote. The classic slightly daft young bimbo seduced by power.
    Doesn't justify what he did, but it takes two. (What the hell do they teach
    young women these days!)

    Ali
     
    Alison Hopkins, Nov 10, 2006
  17. Not to swallow, evidently.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 10, 2006
  18. I am *so* not going there.

    Ali
     
    Alison Hopkins, Nov 10, 2006
  19. Paul Corfield

    Lozzo Guest

    Alison Hopkins says...
    To spit not swallow, obviously

    --
    Lozzo
    Triumph Daytona 955i SE (Black with added black bits)
    GSF600SW (broked)
    'I do not object to people looking at their watches when I am speaking.
    But I strongly object when they start shaking them to make certain they
    are still going.' William Norman Birkett, 1st Baron Birkett, Oct 1960.
     
    Lozzo, Nov 10, 2006
  20. Paul Corfield

    ogden Guest

    Please don't feed the troll.
     
    ogden, Nov 10, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.