But words will never hurt me

X-No-archive: yes

Look, this is usenet. If Texdays sent the email or not, so what! If he
had sent it to me and it was true, I'd be pissed he told it. If it
wasn't true, so what.

During a fight someone gets kicked in the nuts. Scum or just trying to win?

When someone throws punches at almost everyone that comes by, without
knowing who they are, mental state, etc. They can expect an occasional
kick in the nuts. Walker 'may' have been kicked in the nuts.

Texdays didn't send the email without being punched, if he even sent it.
Now, if Texdays can't take a punch, he should stay out of newsgroups. In
that regard, Texday and Walker have something in common.

I suggest more exposure to society and an observer .....louie

 

.....louie, you're still a moron....over.

Now, go back to waiting for those bikers to ride up and piss in your yard.

 

LMAO... must be getting desperate .. "Usenet".. whew..that's a surprise to
everyone.. Since it's "usenet".. must be justification ? hmmm.. don't
think so..

If Texdays sent the email or not, so what! If he

The "not" isn't speculation anymore, except for you and one other "poster"..

win?

"Win" .. what ? Obviously.. you haven't been to many real life "nut
kickins"

That's been the "idea" .. huh ? Remember.. this is "usenet".. All that
usenet nut-kickin' goes two ways.. hmmm... you've still not responded to the
little challenge to produce the posts I've made that offends you most.. Best
I can recall, this is the first post that you've ever initiated .. Since you
named me in this post, I've responded to it.. So far as I recall, I've never
even directed a post to "Louie"..

If Texdays got "punched", he asked for it, just the way he kept demanding
that his e-mail be posted.. Again.. all this "usenet punching" works two
ways..

Got news for you there, sport.. Texdays doesn't have a damn thing in common
with Bill Walker.. I've never attacked anyone's family on this group..
Regardless of whether it's "usenet" or not, there are limits of decency.. If
he'd posted that trash on this newsgroup, he'd have been laughed at.. Too
many people on this group know me and my son personally.. Texdays didn't
believe that e-mail still existed, much less would be posted..

ROTFL... whatever that means..For what it's worth.. I've said that Texdays,
like you .. are "carrying water" for someone else.. There are a great many
people on this newsgroup, who are "real" people and not just participating
here to impress anyone with their phony posturing .. For what it's worth,
some of us are actually working to make a difference.. This forum is a means
to do that.. There are also a lot of others who participate behind "aliases"
and phony representations for their own little agendas.. When they are
exposed as phonies, they all resort to accusing, attacking and will stoop to
whatever level to discredit or humiliate . I've given you a lot more credit
than you probably deserve, in this response.. Part of that credit is the
fact that you've finally initiated a "post".. Take that credit for what it's
worth.. "Carry your own water"..

Bill Walker
Irving, Tx.

 

To me, Usenet is based in conflict, at least some topics are.

Look at the political NG's, they're still raging.

Recently, I've heard(just hearsay, no factual reference) that some
companies are tracking users(both Usenet and web blogs) that are
making accusations against a former employer(a common tactic).

This is clearly grounds for action, just as if it the accusation had
been printed in the newspaper(although probably not as profitable).

I don't know the story behind this riff, but it sounds like someone
might have a pretty strong position as the plaintiff in a libelous action.

I guess you might even be able to file this in small claims court?

File a "John Doe" suit, to produce the subpoena for defendant
identification. Take the subpoena to the ISP, get the accusers
details, amend the suit with the details, they're served, and you're
in business.

If one is really serious about this defamation, this is the way to
run it into the ditch, real quick.

Gary Walker

Some of these references may be from outside the U.S.

http://slashdot.org/articles/00/03/30/0631246.shtml
http://www.cyberlibel.com/bibl.html
http://lists.megacity.org/pipermail/rfci-discuss/2002-July/000772.html
http://groups-beta.google.com/group..._doneTitle=Back+to+Search&&d#f15f689e74da603c
http://groups-beta.google.com/group..._doneTitle=Back+to+Search&&d#178720e93b726ba6

And many other references....

 

It took almost a year to "run this one into the ditch".. In some of my other
posts and responses, I've attempted to put the thing to rest.. Guess that
ain't hapnin'. Most providers and ISP's aren't interested in what goes on in
newsgroups.. Or, so I've heard from ones with more experience than I have..

I'm not big on legal actions and all that stuff, much prefer to deal with
personal matters my own way.. I did and I will continue to do so..I'd
furthur suggest that Texdays finally got a hard dose of medicine that is
long overdue.. If you pay close attention, he's done this same crap in other
newsgroups.. It finally caught up to him.. If he has any pride or dignity
left, he'll either respond like a man (which he isn't) or he'll just fade
away, again..

Also .. you might keep in mind that I offered a simple solution to the
entire shameful mess.. he ignored it.. Texdays did it to himself, by
insisting that I produce the e-mail.. He got what he asked for..

Your friend in Irving
Bill Walker

 

OK, that's fine. Just an alternative....

Gary Walker

 

Actually, that sounds like something I might be able to use here. I recall
Johnny Moron claiming in this group that I neglected my daughter and caused
her death.

I guess I'll check into that in a little while by going down to the jp's
office and seeing what it would take to file such an action. Since I know
where his ISP is and have a good relationship with many...except one...that
might be worth looking into.

 

Good! I'm glad that may help, but understand, you don't need a
good relationship with the ISP. If a JP(small claims) court will
support such an action, the ISP will be obligated to comply.

I do recall that thread some time ago, it was way out of line, even
for Usenet.

Good Luck to ya'

Gary Walker

 

Thanks!