bugger. News server info please....

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Doesnotcompute, May 4, 2004.

  1. it's going to be a little quiet round here for a while. It seems that
    over the weekend the company changed their 3rd party proxy provider, and
    it would appear in doing so, I no longer have nntp access. Or at least,
    not to the German server.

    bugger.

    Do I recall someone from round these parts running a news server for
    this group? Anyone remember who and if it's still working?

    Anyone recommend a free to cheap /web based/ news provider?

    Assuming I got myself a decent connection at home, is there an easy way
    I could get my news via the PC there fed to be accessible from work?

    ta muchly
     
    Doesnotcompute, May 4, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Doesnotcompute

    Eddie Guest

    Doc used to, but not any more. I could let you have access to mine, if
    you've got a fixed IP.
    I might be able to help with that, as well. Mail me if you want more info.
    Depends what sort of 'net access you've got at work, really.
     
    Eddie, May 4, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Doesnotcompute wrote
    Des and dunno.
     
    steve auvache, May 4, 2004
    #3
  4. Eddie wrote:

    done just that.
     
    Doesnotcompute, May 4, 2004
    #4
  5. Doesnotcompute

    Christofire Guest

    You could use something like VNC to access your computer at home and be
    free to do whatever you like. Over BB, it's quite usable.

    You might want to SSH it to be more secure.
     
    Christofire, May 4, 2004
    #5
  6. I have a feeling the ports VNC likes are closed on the work loop. I've
    tried (pathetically) before. I've not liked VNC either - always seemed
    sluggish.
    whoosh.
     
    Doesnotcompute, May 4, 2004
    #6
  7. Doesnotcompute

    Christofire Guest

    You can set it to any you like.
    Heh.
     
    Christofire, May 4, 2004
    #7
  8. WTS or TightVNC
     
    mike. buckley, May 5, 2004
    #8
  9. Doesnotcompute

    sweller Guest

    I found tightvnc temperamental, or at least my machine became a bit
    unstable, the connection was unreliable and wouldn't reconnect. I
    reverted to real vnc.
     
    sweller, May 5, 2004
    #9
  10. Doesnotcompute

    Christofire Guest

    There's also UltraVNC which I tried as it's got file transfer.
    However, more often than not the file transfer would stop halfway, and
    it didn't seem that stable at first. It seems much better now though.

    I notice that tightvnc's got file transfer in it now, so I may go back
    to that. What's realVNC like? I've not tried that one.
     
    Christofire, May 6, 2004
    #10
  11. Doesnotcompute

    sweller Guest

    realVNC is the original one the others seem to be based on. Basic.

    However it is stable and guaranteed to work every time. No file
    transfer, but does have clipboard.

    tightvnc has been a real PITA. My main desktop seems to have gained real
    mouse problems. The USB mouse freezes and I have to unplug it to get it
    working again, this only started following an install of t-vnc. Updated
    drivers hasn't helped.

    It may be coincidence and my MS optical wheelmouse has gone on the fritz
    independently as none of the five other machines are affected (with PS2
    mice).
     
    sweller, May 6, 2004
    #11
  12. Doesnotcompute

    darsy Guest

    VNC sucks, generally though[1], and it's only worth using if you're
    some sort of freak who runs multiple operating systems.

    [1] Windows Terminal Services beats it into a cocked hat.
     
    darsy, May 6, 2004
    #12
  13. Doesnotcompute

    Christofire Guest

    Well, half-waves as I use synergy for controlling a windows machine and
    a linux machine from the same Keyboard+mouse.
    In a similar fashion to the CC sub-thread[2], why? I've found that TS
    is as fast over a 100mbit lan as ultraVNC over adsl (both ends), and as
    no-one else has to use the machine that I'm connecting to there doesn't
    seem to be another plus point to bother with it.

    I know we've done this before, but I've never seen a compelling
    argument of why TS is better than VNC. If there's something then
    great, if not then I'll leave this next to the "Linux is better than
    Windows!" boredom.

    [2] I.e. I forget what I know and see what other people think.
     
    Christofire, May 6, 2004
    #13
  14. Doesnotcompute

    darsy Guest

    this is IME only, but screen-refresh on VNC is very shonky compared to
    TS.

    I use Unicenter Remote Control at work, and that's better than both,
    but it costs money.
     
    darsy, May 6, 2004
    #14
  15. Doesnotcompute

    simonk Guest

    I'm pretty convinced that TS is faster than VNC over low-bandwidth
    connections - I remote-control my home PC over a 256k link from the office
    and it's pretty swift, especially when you turn off the XP-chrome-rendering.

    I'm guessing here, but I imagine that the TS protocol is "aware" of the
    windows/GDI primitives used to construct a windows GUI, and can just send
    information along the lines of "draw a button here" instead of having to
    ship compressed images all the time a la VNC.
     
    simonk, May 6, 2004
    #15
  16. Doesnotcompute

    darsy Guest

    I think you're on the right lines - in fact, AFAIK, the stuff that
    gets transceived by TS is an abstraction layer away from the actual
    graphic image of the screen.
     
    darsy, May 6, 2004
    #16
  17. Doesnotcompute

    mups Guest

    darsy says...
    transceived? My, you are making a rapid climb into management land.
     
    mups, May 6, 2004
    #17
  18. Doesnotcompute

    darsy Guest

    bollocks - that's left over from my CB days 25 years ago, that is...
     
    darsy, May 6, 2004
    #18
  19. Doesnotcompute

    mups Guest

    darsy says...
    I think I'd rather admit to being in management...
     
    mups, May 6, 2004
    #19
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.