Brno race - POTENTIAL SPOILERS

Discussion in 'Motorcycle Racing' started by robotiser, Aug 20, 2006.

  1. But there lies the conundrum: non aficionados are unlikely to be drawn to
    the sport without the interest/support of the media. Unfortunately the
    sports media and programmers seem to want to remain blissfully ignorant of
    sports that don't involve a ball. Even soccer hasn't made it to the
    mainstage and you still have national sports media personalities who malign
    it to the adolation of the 'traditional' American sports. The mainstream
    sports media are generally afraid to take a risk and promote/cover
    non-mainstream sports for fear of losing viewership/readership and the
    ensuing advertising dollars.

    Interest in bicycle racing grew hugely in the first half of this decade due
    to Lance Armstrong. But generally, the interest was in him, rather than the
    spectacle so American interest has already begun to wane. Americans perceive
    bicycles as toys for kids and adult riders as annoyances on the road.

    Motorcycle racing has an image to overcome, too. Mainstream thinks of it as
    crotch rockets and loud Harley pipes, not as the art that we see on
    racetracks.

    Speed is a niche channel showing a niche sport in America. If you want it to
    become more popular, you should be thanking ABC for broadcasting the Laguna
    race at all.

    Is Ulrich still promoting the two-up racetrack rides for local media like he
    has in the past a la Mamola/Ducati? It's a good start.
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 23, 2006
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    I don't know, they were showing the WC games live in the USA, even after the
    USA got booted. :)

    It is a conundrum alright, but that's where a federation needs smart
    marketeers to manage a sport. I still find it hard to believe that the USA
    produced some of the greatest legends of the sport, ever, within the last 20
    years, too, and yet they are utter unknowns in the USA and the sport does
    not command enough public interest to enlist sponsors. It is undeniable an
    opportunity was lost there.
    On the other hand, they *create* sports. The whole poker crap that's swept
    TV, come on, who really wanted to watch it on TV, but now it's a fad. TV has
    power, it does create interest where it previously wasn't. It's marketing
    101. And motorcycle racing doesn't have any marketing in the USA. The AMA
    somehow doesn't see it as its job.
    But then, don't you think the public ought to have caught on to motorcycling
    after, let's see, Roberts, Spencer, Mamola, Rainey, Lawson, Schwantz...
    we're talking a truckful of world championships, some of them won in the
    most memorable racing ever? There's more than just an American winning to
    it, somehow. Although indeed it seems a prerequisite. I don't object to the
    latter, heck, that'll work in most countries. tennis got huge in Germany
    with Becker and Graf. And say what you want about 125cc, but I am not sure
    the sport would be as massive as it is right now if the Nietos and Reggianis
    and then the Pons and Biaggis hadn't inflamed the racing passion in those
    countries where motorcycles were popular anyhow. Which didn't mean that
    people didn't go apeshit over the 500cc races they had no representation in
    for the longest time. My objection merely is with the hypocrisy on the
    matter that creeps up in this newsgroup with some regularity. The argument
    is always about manipulative evil forces in Europe that control the rides
    and TV and everything... not about the pathetic lack of support moto racing
    has in the USA itself... people ought to be thankful for the fact a few Euro
    sponsors keep the sport alive and growing as a world event. The sport has a
    looooong way to go when it comes to sponsorships, but to criticize the ones
    that actually engage is backward provincialism.
    I will next year, when they supposedly do it live. I didn't get the setup
    this year. Those who were interested already saw it, and the event didn't
    seem all that marketed.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 23, 2006
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. robotiser

    robotiser Guest

    Surely the powers that be in the front running teams would be able to
    spot his talent (as if they haven't already) riding his bike to its
    limits, without having to ride it beyond its limits.

    I'm sure I've seen comments predicting Stoner -> Ducati. I can easily
    see that happen. Pedrosa and Rossi are still (relatively) young guns on
    Honda and Yamaha. And I think Ducati would be better off, in the long
    run, with Stoner rather than Gibernau.
     
    robotiser, Aug 23, 2006
    #43
  4. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    While I agree, that fact still needs to be marketed. Contrast is with Greg
    LeMond, who won his Tour with pellets from a gunshot in his body, but
    somehow never was as popular despite being the first American (I think) to
    win it. So it takes a committed sponsors that spends the marketing bucks and
    finds an angle the public buys into. I think we're ultimately saying the
    same thing.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 23, 2006
    #44
  5. robotiser

    Andrew Guest

    Yeah, I don't think there was a Discovery channel or team back then.

    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Toddler
     
    Andrew, Aug 23, 2006
    #45
  6. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    And sappy personal stories sell well in the USA. The masses love
    vulnerability and imperfections in their chosen superstars these days. All
    the actors and singers that come forward with sappy stories about how they
    got abused, shot as teenagers, forced to sell drugs on their way up... I bet
    90% of it is made up sh*t. Just helps grab the spotlight where the public
    has thousands of options to turn their 10 second attention span to... :)

    The key is that it's not about natural appeal or talent. It's about
    *marketing* the heck out something these days. Motorcycle racing has
    absolutely no marketing machine behind it, it is still based on an utterly
    arcane"natural pull" marketing approach, i.e. "those who like this stuff
    will find it", as opposed to the forced push that is used all over the
    place, i.e. "you're pathetically uncool -and an unsensitive human being to
    boot- unless you get into this, pronto etc etc". many people claim the
    pendulum is swinging back into buzz marketing that grows organizally, but
    that approach still has a huge miss-ratio, force feeding the public is what
    works in sports. Why do people think the NFL or NBA are so damn huge? The
    marketing machine to keep them like that is beyond imagination, there's
    nothing "natural" about it. How did wrestling become huge? Or Nascar a
    growing sport again? Marketing campaigns.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 23, 2006
    #46
  7. robotiser

    robotiser Guest

    I must try and keep up!

    Though I was thinking of the long term. I suspect that Rossi and
    Pedrosa will stay put for years, with an opportunity in the next few
    years sometime for someone to take over from LC.
     
    robotiser, Aug 23, 2006
    #47
  8. On cable. In midday. During the workweek.
    True, but there would have been a lot of finger pointing at who was going to
    take the initiative. It would have been a daunting task for the AMA to
    promote a non-American series, even if the 'stars' were American, but in the
    long term, it would have been the smart thing to do. But, as shown by the
    end of the Armstrong era in cycling, viewership would have gone in the
    dumper during the dry spell after Schwantz packed it in.
    It's also cheaper to create and produce your own 'reality' poker series than
    to pay for the TV rights to Dorna
    That seems to be true. But on the other hand, all things being negotiable,
    what's keeping the race promoters from paying the AMA a token amount,
    organizing and marketing the races themselves? Done properly, TV revenues
    would far more than compensate for lost ticket revenue.
    No, somebody has to hold their hand and show them the way. Like I said about
    Americans and ball sports...

    There's more than just an American winning to
    Partially because Americans don't identify with motorcycles as a viable
    means of daily transportation.


    I don't object to the
    Small steps...

    I didn't get the setup
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 24, 2006
    #48
  9. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    It takes a big marketing effort. True. But bycicling did it. Wrestling did
    it. Nacar did. Friggin' televised *poker* is now doing it. It's not that
    hard. It just takes commitment, and sorry, but the AMA has no valid excuse
    for at least not trying,.
    Like the Poker guys make no money out of TV. Come on. MotoGP via Dorna shows
    on public TV channels in Europe, a sure indication they have by far not
    priced themselves too highly. They are clearly still in the mode of building
    the sport in Europe. And doing well there, thank heavens. It remains to be
    seen whether their investment into developing other markets pays off. But
    every true motorcycle racing fan ought to root for their effort. It is not
    yet proven it'll pay off.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 24, 2006
    #49
  10. The US cycling equivalent to the AMA had very little to do with the rise in
    popularity of the sport, believe me. They were in a cycle (no pun intended)
    of cutting budgets and programs, not spending on marketing programs to
    promote the Tour de France. The sport has changed very little domestically.
    "How to become a Millionaire" or whatever it was called, was created because
    it was _much_ cheaper than your typical sitcom.

    Come on. MotoGP via Dorna shows
    The very nature of speculative investments.
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 24, 2006
    #50
  11. robotiser

    sturd Guest

    Mark N suggests:
    That already exists and been on the tube a number of times.
    It's called AMA Grand National and while not 180, it looks like
    it from the sidelines. And it is well over 120 at the mile tracks.


    Carl ?? (I think) points out:
    And this is why in the US the coverage/sponsorship/marketing/etc
    are slim if anything. Amerikans don't watch motorcycle racing. Even
    if they ride (the Hardley guys) they are more interested in Nascar than
    MotoGP. And more interested in the Cleveland Clowns or Pittsburgh
    Feelers than Nascar.

    Is it chicken/egg situation? I doubt it but there may be some of that.
    Supercross is doing pretty darn good at getting live audiences but
    still doesn't get regularly scheduled live coverage on the tube.

    I'm happy we get what we've got. My 9 year old is used to me yelling
    at the tube when they cut to the leader, all by himself, and there's a
    fight for 2nd thru 6th. Might as well resign myself to this scenario
    for the
    forseeable future.


    Go fast. Take chances.
    Mike S.
     
    sturd, Aug 24, 2006
    #51
  12. robotiser

    sturd Guest

    T3 knows:
    You know if they ever use radar and get real numbers?
    I know that they average over 100 at Springfield, at least.


    Go fast. Take chances.
    Mike S.
     
    sturd, Aug 24, 2006
    #52
  13. robotiser

    sturd Guest

    T3 opines:
    I'm with ya. And joe round ball watchin guy next door won't
    watch it on the tube because.... I wish I knew.


    Go fast. Take chances.
    Mike S.
     
    sturd, Aug 24, 2006
    #53
  14. robotiser

    Andrew Guest

    Because there are no rapists/drug abusers/gangsta's/steriod abusers in
    MC racing. It doesn't make for a good backstory.

    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Toddler
     
    Andrew, Aug 25, 2006
    #54
  15. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    Hey, show some respect for Gobert's accomplishments in that area! :)
     
    pablo, Aug 25, 2006
    #55
  16. robotiser

    Andrew Guest

    Oh yeah I forgot about Aaron. I met his brother a few weeks ago at the
    Seattle 100. I rode with him, Hayes, Holden and Yates.

    Yates is hysterical, we had a charity auction/dinner and I had Yates
    laughing and dancing around like Tony Fania at Daytona, flipping me off
    with both hands!

    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Toddler
     
    Andrew, Aug 25, 2006
    #56
  17. robotiser

    Andrew Guest


    Oops change Aaron above to Anthoy. I got the brothers mixed up.

    Aaron I rode with. I shot up with Anthony. :)

    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Toddler
     
    Andrew, Aug 25, 2006
    #57
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.