Brno race - POTENTIAL SPOILERS

Discussion in 'Motorcycle Racing' started by robotiser, Aug 20, 2006.

  1. robotiser

    robotiser Guest

    [Possible spoilers in followups]

    Where did that come from?
     
    robotiser, Aug 20, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Six pairs of lucky underpants worn at once.
     
    Bikini Whacks, Aug 20, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    Capirossi in a very inspired performance. Several people started strong, but
    couldn't quite hold it up.

    Most notable was the battle for second between Rossi and Pedrosa. These two
    don't ride well along each other, and it's probably only a matter of time
    until they crash. One move reminsiced me of the one that sent Biaggi one a
    few years ago, were someone had a line that swept in from the outside into
    Biaggi's line. Hm. Perhaps we see a few paralels in riding style between
    Pedrosa and Biaggi, masters of the 250cc clean line, clashing with the
    somewhat more brtual approach some of the other top category riders take on
    occasion, braking deeper and then going for a line towards the inside that
    allows them to apply power to make up for lost corner speed. Not a good mix,
    and predictably Rossi nearly swept Pedrosa's front, on Pedrosa nearly took
    Rossi's rear out, depending on where your loyalties may lie. In the end,
    Pedrosa made a predictable mistake and lost out on Rossi.

    Hayden had a good start and looked like he'd be a shoe-in for the podium,
    but started to fade and finished a disappointing 9th. He very maturely
    stated in a post-race interview he made some wrong decisions in his setup,
    blamed himself, and promised to come back strong. Champion's attitude,
    they're not going to crack him mentally.

    Entertaining fight -which was highlighted way too little- between Roberts,
    Melandri and Stoner for 4th. Roberts' good q this time translated into a 4th
    place, second best Honda, etc etc. Things are looking good for the Roberts
    team. Makes one wonder what would happen if eventually the Roberts' team
    chassis expertise was matched with full-blown factory top spec Honda engines
    and support.

    Melandri and Stoner finish 5th and 6th, this time Stoner keeps it together
    and finishes in what must be regarded as a great result for any rookie in a
    novice privateer MGP team, but somehow with Stoner expectations have already
    built up to the point where it amazingly simply seems a decent result for
    him. It is a competitive grid alright.

    Hopkins and Nakano follow.

    Now to the Edwards thing, once again he comes in what must be a very
    disappointing 10th. However, I just don't believe he no longer is one of the
    better riders in the grid, unable to come close to podium finishes
    henceforth. I suppose this means that he just showcases where the Yamaha
    truly ranks as a competitive machine this season. I conetinue to hang on to
    my theory that Rossi's pre-season distractions and lack of focus resulted in
    the Yamaha going astray, and thus I think that all in all Rossi is where he
    deserves to be. Winning a title is a combination of many on track and off
    track things, and this year Rossi failed the grade when it came to preparing
    for the season.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 20, 2006
    #3
  4. robotiser

    hunnma Guest

    Very surprised at Hayden today after getting off well i fully expected
    him on the podium today,but he did seem to be scrutinizing his tyres
    at the end of the race,but that could of been a bit if sandbagging,who
    knows
    maybe your right and the pressure was telling.If all his main rivals
    have no dnf's for the rest of the season i fear he may wilt a la
    Bayliss under
    the pressure,i've always sensed a bit of nervy there,as in compared to
    Rossi
    Ped,Capo et al.and the pressure amounting will be huge.
    There was an interview with a Honda top brass before the race,and he
    implieed
    no team orders at that time,and any decision on that would be left to
    Pedrosa
    who they would expect natrually to comply if out of the title race.So
    no change
    there.Lets just hope for Nickys sake theres no team orders for him to
    assist Danni at the last race of the season!
    Must add shocking coverage of the race today,very disappointed.
    we missed an epic battle for fourth with constant positional change
    including championship
    leader,and we saw a nano second of it.Was screaming at the freakin tv
    to switch to
    them and they stayed on Danni falling back from Rossi,and Loris miles
    in front,
    when possibly the best fight of the season was reaching climax.
    Absolute shite.
     
    hunnma, Aug 20, 2006
    #4
  5. robotiser

    hunnma Guest

    Totally agree with the above.You may have something with a tv coverage
    euromed conspiracy,i'll admit that.Another small annoyance when they
    switch
    the results off after about 8th comes in,as if the rest of the field
    doesnt matter.
    Cant be long before multi cam option,or rider watch as in the football
    coverage.
     
    hunnma, Aug 21, 2006
    #5
  6. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    as opposed to US coverage, where they will not cover events unless a US
    athlete wins or a well-known US athlete stands a chance of winning. Look at
    the disgraceful coverage of the Olympics in the US every for years if you
    doubt that...

    It beyond amazes me someone in the USA with an IQ over 75 would fall for
    this shit, really. Wait a sec, let us collectively guess why they showed
    coverage of the Laguna Seca GP with a one week delay, pimping the Hayden
    legend all the way in the process, and trying to make it look like it was
    all happening live for the USA backyard... oh, conspiracies, hey?

    At least they show the fucking races live in Europe on public TV before it's
    established who'll win.

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 21, 2006
    #6
  7. robotiser

    hunnma Guest

    I'll admitt i'm being picky
    live on two channels here,if you got satellite as well.Plus live
    coverage of practice
    and qualifying too,with plenty of repeats through the week also.
    just seems strange that the climax should be spoilt by ridiculous
    direction from
    whoevers producing it.
    I'm sure most countries have a slight bias though when it comes to the
    Olympics
    and such events.Any event Britain is in will get over hyped just the
    same here.
    you should see the state we get in when we have a chance of the ladies
    curling gold!
    And as for Eddie The Eagle Edwards.....
    I dont see too much wrong with a country focusing on its own.
     
    hunnma, Aug 21, 2006
    #7
  8. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    I actually do when I just want to see the best events with the best athletes
    covered. I take huge exception to coverage that prioritizes based on who
    wins what, as opposed to what is the biggest event. case in point, when a
    Greek athlete won the 200m, the event wasn't shown on US prime television,
    it was browaed through at a total off time... disgraceful, I thought. I
    honestly felt the same way about the delayed Laguna coverage, as good as I
    thought the fact was that the event got prime time coverage. For the record,
    track and field and MotoGP is shown in Spain live no matter what, and the
    100m and 200m sprints are highlighted as top events even though no Spaniard
    in history has ever won them. Just like the 500cc races were shown live,
    always, even when no Spaniards even competed or stood a hope on hell of
    winning back in the late 70s and 80s, and were covered as the top event.

    So when people talk abou the "biased coverage"... or a biased public...
    bullshit. Europe has a long history of watching the event live, by the
    100,000s... irrespective of who wins. And when people exalt the greatness of
    AMA.. remind me how many people attend the events live...

    Why does it always come down to these garbage arguments about bias and bla
    bla bla? Again, all the USA has got to do is cough up some interest and some
    fucking sponsors. Sadly, those who care in the US represent such a minority
    that US sponsors don't bother to cater to them, or expect them to simply
    follow the events in Europe and be happy with that. Hardly Europe's fault.

    As far as race coverage goes, they tend to focus on the front too much,
    irrespective of nationalities. And perhaps someone can tell us why the 250cc
    and 125cc races are often omitted in US coverage. And let us know whether
    they truly think it'd be the same if some young hotshot got recruited into
    the Red Bull development team, eh?

    ....pablo
     
    pablo, Aug 21, 2006
    #8
  9. robotiser

    robotiser Guest

    I thought that being able to go to the limits of traction, but no
    further, was a sign of a good rider. Rossi does this frequently does he
    not? I can't remember the race, but right at the start Rossi was about
    5th or so, and had a "moment" which the commentators said would have
    been a DNF if it wasn't Rossi having it.
     
    robotiser, Aug 21, 2006
    #9
  10. dude, USGP was shown *live*
    it was rebroadcast a week later (and once or twice in between)

    Bruce
     
    Bruce Hartweg, Aug 21, 2006
    #10
  11. robotiser

    Andrew Guest


    The first 10 laps I must've seen Pedrosa slide the front 4X.
    He recovers amazingly. He seemed to ride better later in the race. I
    think he was REALLY pushing to get up to Rossi. Then he settled in.

    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Infant
     
    Andrew, Aug 21, 2006
    #11
  12. robotiser

    Andrew Guest

    Heh....we get Speed, and they do live coverage of some of the AMA races,
    and the USGP. We get F1 Live on Speed too, but MotoGP, is rarely live
    on Speed. I think Brno might have been a live broadcast, it was on at
    8am Pacific time. We also get WSBK and WSS.
    The USGP/ABC repeat was basically a Honda commercial.

    There's a lot of Motocross action on TV in the USA.
    ESPN, OLN, ABC, etc all show Supercross, MotoX, and Freestyle.
    I think the dirtbike market over here is pretty big.



    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Infant
     
    Andrew, Aug 21, 2006
    #12
  13. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    So what you're saying is that the only MotoGP shown live on a major US
    channel was the one MotoGP that took place in the USA and was won by a USA
    rider? Not a very strong point for USA networks' utter neutrality, you'll
    agree...

    Note that, it was shown live on a specialized cable channel, SpeedTV. In
    Spain, every MotoGP is shown live on the top air channels everybody gets to
    see. There's a difference right there.
     
    pablo, Aug 21, 2006
    #13
  14. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    But bigger than the sportsbike market?
     
    pablo, Aug 21, 2006
    #14
  15. robotiser

    Andrew Guest

    Yeah I regularly see families trailing 4 or 5 dirtbikes into/out of
    Seattle. Cheap fun for the kiddies. I can't wait till my toddler can
    get on a dirtbike.


    --
    Andrew
    00 Daytona
    00 Speed Triple
    71 Kawi H1
    05 Infant
     
    Andrew, Aug 21, 2006
    #15
  16. As far as I know, the Eurosport satellite footprint doesn't reach North
    America. I don't know how far east it goes or how hard/expensive it would be
    to re-aim it.


    Carl
    Contributing to the NG in a positive manner
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 21, 2006
    #16
  17. You don't see many 8 year olds on sportbikes.
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 21, 2006
    #17
  18. who won was a non-issue. they scheduled it live before they knew who won.

    and yes it is the only live GP I know of (time zone differneces eh?)
    although the BRNO this weekend was broadcast early so I guess it might
    have been live.

    But before you go off on some tirade about how the US is bigoted against
    foreign blah blah blah, also not that very few AMA races are live either
    and there is no timezone problems like most of the GP rounds.
    The truth is that the US Public isn't that interested in MC racing,
    so it doesn't get the broadcast exposure.

    people here like football, baseball, nascar - all of which get plenty of
    time both live and ancillary shows.
    then live there for your own happiness.

    Bruce
     
    Bruce Hartweg, Aug 21, 2006
    #18
  19. robotiser

    pablo Guest

    Among my entire circle in CA (and I know a lot of people) only 1 family has
    a dirtbike. I have met far fewer people with dirtbikes than sportsbikes.
    This probably distorts my perception, since I am well aware MotoX is a big
    sport. But it'd be interesting to see market size studies.

    This would be awesome:

    http://www.packagedfacts.com/produc...3&kw=&CatReturnURL=&SearchReturnURL=&view=abs
     
    pablo, Aug 22, 2006
    #19
  20. It could just be a factor related to whom you hang out with if you hang out
    with a lot of sportbike people.

    There's gotta be a site showing sales figures somewhere on the web for free.
     
    Carl Sundquist, Aug 22, 2006
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.