Blimey! 24 degrees.

I'll have to say that I agree with that. The dozy pillock reminds me of
CWO.

 

Dear old Clocky. Went running to his Mum, iirc. Then there was
Technotwat, of course...... Remember the porny pictures of his sister on
his website?

Happy days.

We've still got the usual fantasists, sad bastards, wannabes and
Purveyors Of Bullshit & Untruths but we haven't had a good hallmarked
nutter here for ages. If this mouth-frother and Des want to have a pop
at each other, let them.

 

He isn't.

 

The Older Gentleman wrote

It weren't all good. 27k dialup for me in those times. Broadband adds
so much more to the experience.

 

genuine_froggie barfed:

<snip>

Oh dear. I'd laugh if you weren't so sad.

Lets see, you're delusional in so many ways.
"Gods gift to women"
"Riding god"
"I live in the best place on earth"
"I write the best prose on Usenet"
"I'm omnipresent"
"I can read everyone elses mind"
"I have friends"

In summary, an insane fuckwit. One that 99% of UKRMers like taking a
potshot at, cause, lets face it, we can't quite believe how far into
your fantasy world you'll actually descend before they drag you away
and fit you for that tailor made strait jacket.

I'm not hostile, or bitter. You just bite, each and every time. And the
output of your twisted, bitter, fantasy world is highly amusing.

Keep it up old bean. Yip! Yip! Yipyipyip!

Electro Convulsive Therapy. The only answer.

 

Somehow, I doubt very much that you're in the mood to laugh, Richard.

I never wrote that.

I _certainly_ didn't write that.

Well, if tourists 'vote' with their feet, the world would appear to agree
with me.

Har, har ! You pathetic man. Show me where I wrote that.

LOL!! Why not go the whole hog and say that I claimed to 'be God' ?

ROFL !! You're losing it.

*snort*

Quite astounding. And quite revealing of how close to the truth I actually
'aimed', considering the above pack of fabrications, none of which I ever
said or wrote with one exception, but which you provide as 'proof', simply
in order to say, 'look, "desi" [sic] this !'

What a loser.

I can only speculate as to the ridicule I or any other 'unpopular' poster
would have incurred, had I crashed my bike (and event for which you had my
sincere sympathy), had a period of convalescence, and promptly crashed my
new bike the first time I rode it. Maybe you'd have called me a 'riding
god' then (*snigger*) ...

If I were you, Richard, I'd take a step back from your screen, and try to
wipe some of that saliva off it.

Oh you're a hypocrite; that much isn't in question. You know it, I know
it, and two other people here know it. Whether the rest of UKRM will take
my word for it, considering your past plaintive whingeing and 'threats' to
do yourself in, is not really my concern. More than likely they'll *plonk*
me, and you'll be fêted as some sort of hero. For once, I'm willing to let
that go, as I believe that you need some 'positive reinforcement'.

What was that supposed to be ? Dear God, look at yourself, Richard ! Go
and get yourself a woman, for Christ's sake !

You loser.

 

Actually, just realised: I know it, you know it, the couple concerned
knows it, and one other person with whom I had a drink a while back,
knows it.

You came up in conversation, and I was asked why you seemed to be
showing such hostility (you know, the hostility that you 'don't show',
eh ..?) towards me. I recounted the story of your hypocrisy [1],
especially considering that I even went out of my way to visit you in
hospital, and the person responded, 'Doesn't surprise me'.

What a hypocrite.

[1] none of that which I revealed, took place in private conversations

 

....that posting two separate replies to the same post in this context, is a
sure sign that *someone* is getting a tad wound up.

That, and a bit too personal.

Take the hint, 'buddy'.

 

Well he'll _say_ that he is.

 

I answered them in two different newsreaders, you'll notice.

Quite: hint taken. It's just that 'fake R1' or no 'fake R1', I can't stand
hypocritical fuckers, and having to swallow that twat's 'they're a lovely
couple', knowing full-well that he'd been trying to shag the person in
question behind her husband's back for two years, is a bit much. I'm not a
hypocrite: if I have something to say about someone, I'll say it to his or
her face.

 

Yes, and?

Given the rest of this that I've snipped... I think not.

 

Whatever you say, Richard.

 

Quite possibly, but he ain't any more. He's stalked Des over to ukrm and
is letting fly.

 

Was that the one where Cat had a dump in the reverse reality? Eewww

 

Just a quick response, and then you can get back to being a manic
depressive..

I haven't seen you since I was in your place in Milton Keynes with Elly,
Jen, Ginge, and that little guy, don't recall his name. I seem to recall
your being quite affable and pleasant at that time.

_That's_ why I didn't tell you straight to your face that you're a
hypocritical ****.

Next time I'm in the UK, I can pop over and do so, if you'd like.

 

Whatever. I see that he's playing the 'hurt little girl' card now. The
fucker should've thought of that before spouting forth this infantile,
cack-handed and (quite frankly) load of _false_ allegations ...

<

 

Well, yes, this is precisely the point.

 

Don't agree. Des is worse. 'sides, that's not what you said ealier! ;-)

 

Verdigris wrote

I agree. I find this aspect of the whole affair particularly worrying.

 

I see what you mean. Yeah, OK. I was just agreeing with the "ignore"
bit. I mean, let the two batter the blazes out of each other. Who GAF?