Best way to travel 5 miles to a train station?

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by David, Aug 11, 2004.

  1. David

    Velvet Guest

    I have no idea. We didn't cover permanent traffic lights, just
    temporary ones! :)
     
    Velvet, Aug 13, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. David

    Velvet Guest

    Indeed it didn't, because it covered *temporary* traffic lights, which
    don't have induction loops...
     
    Velvet, Aug 13, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. And you will now post me the link to where I said they were... Oh, I
    didn't.
    And yet, nationally, the drivers still manage to kill many more people
    per mile travelled than do the cyclists. Why is that, do you think?

    Guy
     
    Just zis Guy, you know?, Aug 13, 2004
  4. David

    Abso Guest

    The point is that a green traffic light doesn't give one carte blanche
    to drive with no regard to the risk of another breaching the right of
    way. After all a traffic light junction is still a junction where
    roads cross and there is the potential for collision.

    Quite apart from this, most cyclists (the semi-professional peddlers of
    ukrc excluded) move at a sedate pace and should leave a car driver time
    to take avoiding action as long as the car is being driven at an
    appropriate speed.
    No.
     
    Abso, Aug 13, 2004
  5. David

    Tony Raven Guest

    Oh, I don't know. DTLR figures for 2001 show 66% of cars exceed the
    30mph limit in urban areas. A Met Police survey in London showed 63%
    exceeding the 30mph limit with 10% doing over 50mph. Not that that makes
    anybody else breaking the law alright but mass breaking of the rules is
    not the monopoly of any one group.

    Tony
     
    Tony Raven, Aug 13, 2004

  6. Except that this was how many American cars were *built* in the 1950s
    and the casualty rate was horrendous.

    Seriously, look at some of the chrome steering wheel bosses fitted to
    cars at the time....
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 13, 2004

  7. <snip>

    OK, you do it. Under existing C&U regulations, of course.

    Can't be done.

    You *might* get away with registering it as an agricultural vehicle.....
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 13, 2004
  8. So they don't happen, then. Right, that's sorted.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 13, 2004

  9. .....which they're marketing very effectively, IMHO.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 13, 2004
  10. Funnily enough, here I agree. It's so distinctive I love it.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 13, 2004
  11. So how, precisely, do companies force people who live more than a
    short distance away, to work for them in the first place, and at
    unsocial hours in the second place?

    Guy
     
    Just zis Guy, you know?, Aug 13, 2004
  12. In
    Closest think I've seen to this is the old sign on buses reminding people to
    "let buses pull out" (Highway code rule 198). But that's not a law, just
    advice.

    A
     
    Ambrose Nankivell, Aug 13, 2004
  13. David

    Ben Guest

    **** 'em. Round here they all like to pull out into yellow box
    junctions and block them.
     
    Ben, Aug 13, 2004
  14. David

    Gunga Dan Guest

    (The Older Gentleman) wrote
    Admittedly I was being flippant, but that's not what I said.
    I appreciate it's along and dull thread to plough through but I'm not sure
    what the point is of snipping all relevant context and then making a point
    based on the result; and I don't recognise it as being your style. Welcome
    back, btw.

    My argument throughout this thread has not been that accidents don't happen
    or that some effort shouldn't be made to minimise the results, but that
    there comes a point where the law of diminishing returns applies and that it
    would be better to encourage people to avoid accidents in the first place
    rather than dealing with the consequences of what are relatively rare
    events. I'm surprised you disagree with that.
     
    Gunga Dan, Aug 13, 2004
  15. David

    AndrewR Guest

    I've seen one[1], what do I win?

    [1] On the Coventry ring-road, of all places. Cyclists was on the
    ring-road and the car was joining it. The slip-roads onto the road are very
    short, the car driver was looking behind to check for cars as he moved over,
    didn't see the cyclist and collected him neatly on his bonnet. I stopped
    and the cyclist was OK, apart from a few minor cuts and bruises.


    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, TEAR#3 (and KotL), DS#5, COSOC#9, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, Aug 13, 2004
  16. David

    sweller Guest


    This is a slightly different premise to the one you stated initially.

    The employers 'force' the worker in because they offer the only rate for
    the skills that are on offer. You rely on a true market economy - this
    doesn't exist.

    The employers know by skewing the market either by deskilling or by
    allowing an atmosphere of desperation amongst low skilled grades (and I
    include a lot of management and administrative positions) results in a
    good pool to draw from and there will always be people desperate enough
    to break ranks and work for less.

    As their earning power in this distorted market is not commensurate with
    the cost of living in the area they have to commute into work. This,
    bizarrely, is considered quite normal. To take an extreme but valid
    example look at the 'Okie' orange pickers of the '30s US.

    The point I made in reply to your statement "If nobody was prepared to
    work antisocial hours in central London the rate for the job would
    rapidly escalate to the point
    where they would" was that there is no 'free' market. Workers are forced
    to take what is on offer.

    What there is - is distorted.

    The only effective way to achieve a change in the balance of power is
    through industrial muscle. Which is to say: distort the market in your
    favour.

    If you were organised enough to ensure an industrial gun was held to the
    employers head you could force wages (as opposed to earnings - they are
    distinct entities) over the market level. To expect this to happen
    naturally, in the context under discussion, is very unusual and
    touchingly optimistic.

    Market forces are assisted by the state to ensure low skilled employees
    go where the work is for the rate that is on offer, which is kept
    artificially low and the economic cultural pressure kept high. There is
    no 'free' wage market in the industrialised West.

    .... Now the discussion enters the arena of wage slavery - this time the
    wage slaves are the middle classes.
     
    sweller, Aug 13, 2004
  17. David

    Gunga Dan Guest

    Cool. Undying affection OK?

    TBH, I'm beginning to wish I hadn't posted that sentence - the one about not
    having seen that type of accident - it's causng all sort of problems.
    Concave bonnets for improved scoopage. Maybe that's the answer.
     
    Gunga Dan, Aug 13, 2004
  18. David

    Tony Raven Guest

    Never mind about whether it hurt him - did the car look good?

    Tony
     
    Tony Raven, Aug 13, 2004
  19. David

    Gunga Dan Guest

    After having some lardy cyclist land on the bonnet, I doubt it.
     
    Gunga Dan, Aug 13, 2004
  20. David

    AndrewR Guest

    It was a Rover, so no, it didn't look good.

    Did a fair old job of throwing Mr Cycle-bloke up in the air, though.


    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, TEAR#3 (and KotL), DS#5, COSOC#9, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, Aug 13, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.