Are soldiers murderers?

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by anzac, Apr 25, 2009.

  1. anzac

    G-S Guest

    "The most accepted definition" is not the same as "they agree", it just
    means that the largest of the arguing minority opinions is thus.
    I prefer to make $ rather than cents... bike bits are expensive these days.

    G-S
     
    G-S, Apr 30, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  2. anzac

    Pietro Guest

    Perhaps you could point to some reference source other than your own
    imaginings as to how this latin phrase could not only be construed to mean
    what you claim, but that it is in fact used by others in 'a more
    genral(sic) usage' to mean what you claim.

    Your incoherence is delightful. Shovels for digging self out of pit are
    that way ->

    Pietro
     
    Pietro, Apr 30, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  3. anzac

    x.x Guest


    oh ok I like to lick other things
     
    x.x, Apr 30, 2009
  4. anzac

    Diogenes Guest


    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/non+sequitur

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=non+sequitur

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non+sequitur

    http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/non-sequitur.html

    Is that enough, or would you like more?
    You're the one digging a hole...


    =================

    Onya bike

    Gerry
     
    Diogenes, Apr 30, 2009
  5. anzac

    Diogenes Guest

    Oh I get it... You're not familiar with the fallacy of logic know as
    argumentum ad numerum.

    Argumentum ad numerum: This fallacy consists of asserting that the
    more people who support or believe a proposition, the more likely it
    is that that proposition is correct.

    There are quite few fallacies of logic, Geoff. You might like to look
    them up some day. :)


    =================

    Onya bike

    Gerry
     
    Diogenes, Apr 30, 2009
  6. anzac

    Peter Wyzl Guest

    Arses perhaps?

    P
     
    Peter Wyzl, Apr 30, 2009
  7. anzac

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Sure, Murder probably involves premeditiation and intent. I think
    you're chasing your tail with all this "court must decide on [un]
    lawfulness" business. Presumably this means that there is a piece of
    legislation which details the situations in which a person is allowed
    to kill another person with intent and premeditation? Maybe you could
    post a link to that? If not, is it determined by common law, and
    doesn't common law set precedents, so why would it be necessary for a
    court to pass judgement again. That's reinventing the wheel.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    But your using "prove God DOESN'T exist" logic here Nev.
    Murder has to be found; yes. Claiming that not-murder also has to be found
    is silly.
    If a killing isn't found to be murder then it's not murder; simple as that.
    It doesn't have to be legal under other legislation.

    Buggered if I can imagine why you're persisting with this bizarre murder
    stuff (I figure it must be a bet or something) but that angle is just silly.
     
    Knobdoodle, Apr 30, 2009
  8. anzac

    x.x Guest

    U didn't read the entire convo did you silly boy
     
    x.x, Apr 30, 2009
  9. anzac

    Knobdoodle Guest

    The same god who commanded Abraham to kill his own son!
     
    Knobdoodle, Apr 30, 2009
  10. anzac

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Only a court can decide if a killing is murder.
     
    Knobdoodle, Apr 30, 2009
  11. anzac

    Diogenes Guest

    Oh here we go again....

    Yes, only a court can "find" or "decide" but murder is still murder,
    whether it gets to court or not.

    And courts can get it wrong. A court may find that a killing was
    manslaughter even though the truth was that it was murder. The truth
    doesn't always make it to court.


    =================

    Onya bike

    Gerry
     
    Diogenes, Apr 30, 2009
  12. anzac

    Pietro Guest

    Same as above
    Same as above - except with an example including Theo's penis size (go
    figure) and the word 'Dude' in the lowest rated response but still
    esentially the same.
    Same as above
    Same as above
    Oh do go on - it is apparent that actually believe yourself.
    In your perception perhaps but you are certainly the one in the hole.

    Pietro
     
    Pietro, May 1, 2009
  13. Then it is and will remain an alledged murder until proven by a court of law
    as only a court of law can detirmine if a killing was murder. Murder is not
    an act it is a result of being found guilty.

    Capt. A. L.
     
    Capt.about_lunchtime, May 1, 2009
  14. anzac

    bill_h Guest

    So there was no murder before the inception of Courts of Law?

    Bill
     
    bill_h, May 1, 2009
  15. Was the term even used before the courts of law?
    If you believe so define murder before a system of law existed.

    Capt. A. L.
     
    Capt.about_lunchtime, May 1, 2009
  16. anzac

    bill_h Guest

    Actually I was being a smart arse, but seeing as you bit...

    You\re the one saying that only a 'court of law' can determine if a
    killing was murder. Up to you to prove it.

    I think it was Clem who commented that the idea of murder didn't
    appear simply because legal codes were established. Primitive
    civilisations had social codes prohibiting and punishing murder before
    they had 'courts of law'.

    And interestingly, the word murder is related, in old English, to the
    French word mordre (bite) in reference to the heavy compensation one
    must pay for causing an unjust death. (from wikipedia). So even murder
    isn't murder, could be manslaugher or something else.

    Bill
     
    bill_h, May 1, 2009
  17. They were their laws and those amongst them respociable for enforcing those
    laws decided if the killing was murder or otherwise.


    Of corse murder is murder. Manslaughter is manslaughter it's different to
    murder. That's why we need courts to detirmine what each act of apparently
    unlawful kiling is. Is it murder, manslaughter, justifiable homicide,
    killing in self defence, accidental killing, killing but with diminished
    responciability . Until a court, or whatever other body upholds the laws of
    a civilisation in question, makes a decision regarding the perpetrator of
    the killing it's only a killing or an alledged murder.

    Capt. A. L.
     
    Capt.about_lunchtime, May 1, 2009
  18. anzac

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Nope; just a hell of a lot of killing!
     
    Knobdoodle, May 1, 2009
  19. anzac

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Not me.
     
    Knobdoodle, May 1, 2009
  20. anzac

    Diogenes Guest

    No, you clearly can't read properly. It said, inter alia, "a
    statement having little or no relation to what preceded it"
    No, you clearly can't read properly. It said, inter alia, "A
    statement that has little or nothing to do with the preceding
    statement."
    No, you clearly can't read properly. It said, inter alia,
    "a statement that is not clearly related to anything previously said"
    No, you clearly can't read properly. It said, inter alia, "response
    that does not logically proceed from what has been said"
    Well I'd say that I'm now well and truly out the hole in which you
    have imagined me to be, old chap.

    I have demonstrated , using several references , how this latin phrase
    could not only be construed to mean what I claim, but that it is in
    fact used by others in 'a more general usage' to mean what I claim
    (to borrow your words).

    Now bugger off before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
    As I said, go play with Wyzl. You two would get on well. And who
    knows, you might even be able to enlist the good Lunchtime Captain and
    his trusty sidekick, Knobdribble, and form some sort of club for
    people who entangle themselves in legalisitic gobbledegook to such an
    extent that they can no longer understand the caution which ought o be
    mounted above the entrance to every court house in the land, namely,
    "THE LAW IS AN ASS".

    =================

    Onya bike

    Gerry
     
    Diogenes, May 2, 2009
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.