Imagine how easy it is with even more mass, and even bigger bars. Trouble is, on the Wing, you're dragging a shade of front, too, but they're so shit, the bike doesn't tend to notice. -- | ___ Salad Dodger |/ \ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/KH500A8/TS250C/exTS185C _/_____\_ ..57146../..13615.../..3157./.19406/.fecked. |_\_____/_| IMC#4 TPPFATUICG#7 YTC#4 DIAABTCOD#9 PM#5 (>|_|_|<) BOTAFOT #70 two#11 Ignoramus #0001 |__|_|__| BOTAFOF #09 IbW#0 & KotIbW# OSOS#07 \ |^| / WG* BotTOS #6 GP#4 ANORAK#17 \|^|/ 2003 RBR landmarks:81 points:1740 miles:6835 '^'
You need to stand downwind of it, mate. It smells *gorgeous*, of oil and metal and rubber all combined into an olfactory assault that says "real bike".
Heh. No way. The fastest I *ever* saw out of mine, coming down the Creg on the IOM, was an indicated 120+. but the whole thing was bouncing and vibrating so much it could have been 20mph. Bike trapped it at 114. The fairing really slowed it down, apparently.
<TOGbait> Between 18 and 24 I hardly ever used any 2 wheeled transport at all, then I did DAS and got a bike licence. </TOGbait> Maybe that has a bearing on my ineptness too.
Heh. *ding* I think ;-) Certainly gives me more confidence when I'm going in towards the limits of what I feel comfortable with.
I'm sure I did, but you still didn't see anything *like* this quantity of "How do I ride better?" stuff. Either it wasn't a problem or (more likely) we didn't recognise it as such. Probably too busy trying to handle crap Japanese frames, tyres, and brakes that didn't work in the wet.
On a more modern tack, but incredibly horny: http://cmac.smugmug.com/gallery/44/1/887/Original Further on the same tack: http://www.ghezzi-brian.com/English/Galleria_Immagini/index_ing.htm
That was *the* roar of the day..... ....to use a Blackadder quote, She was "..thicker than a whale omelette"
Andy Bonwick said: As one who does teach how, I look on it as creating a monster. But it's my monster.
Indeed - I would say a back protector may have helped, but it wouldnt' have stopped him being injured. He got run over... somewhat worse then just falling off.
Heh - I almost rammed him twice as I thought he'd finished braking and was winding on. He wasn't. Hence my comments
I used to do this a fair bit on the Trumpet - much less so on the gixxer. Never quite worked out _exactly_ what was going on but there were at least two things that I could identify: 1. When not confident about how much speed to carry in to a corner, dragging a bit of rear (and varying how much) can allow a bit of extra retardation without too much "sitting-up", which you'd get with the front. 2. The poise of the bike was much more predictable and much less prone to getting out-of-shape when encountering mid-corner bumps. I've noticed that the gixxer has _much_ less of a tendency to either of these - i.e. I can use front brake in a corner much more predictably and it doesn't start to get that unstable weave/wobble on poor surfaces - so I don't do it any more. Except when I forget. Both of these I'd put down to far superior suspension which basically makes the gixxer inherently more stable at speeds that may have had the Triumph at its limit.
I used to do it past a dozen cars or more at a time on my MK-Cambridge commute a few years back. Prolly passed a couple of hundred like that every day in total. With hard panniers on the Trumpet an' all. TBF some of the road did have a nice bike lane [1][2] in the middle, but I didn't limit such behaviour to there. And I still don't think I was doing anything 'wrong'. In fact, I've done the same on the gixxer a few times, although it's not strictly necessary on the roads round here. [1] Solid lined x-hatching about three feet across [2] Full of road shit, mind, so not recommended for max braking.
I'm still trying to understand what you mean by this... bad ascii art: ------ | CarA | --> ------ RiderA ------ <-- | CarB | ------ (doesn't really matter which way RiderA is going...) Is that what you mean? *ding*