Another YTC nomination

Yes, I know. I'm just saying the standards are a bit excessive.

 

muddy wrote

I disagree. I think Bear is right to keep the standard high.

 

The guy who left the wrapper on his visor insert should have got one.

 

Tis your right to do so.

 

Complained that his visor was still misting up after fitting the insert and
turned out he was riding on with the protective wrapper still in. To be fair
I think Bear said that it was a close call and had the guy actually crashed
as a result then he would probably have got one.

 

I missed that one.

 

*snort*

 

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.../b8d7609f4a3205d1?tvc=2&q=pinlock+misting+ytc

 

The comedy never stops on UKRM. I love it.

 

flash says...

I think the young lad whose mother called our office complaining that we
sold a helmet with a defective visor deserves one too, for not reading
the protective film[1] which clearly states "Warning, Be sure to remove
this film before riding". It took the sappy **** three weeks before he
complained that he was having difficulty seeing where he was going.

[1] Heavily printed with visor changing instructions and digrams

 

muddy? He'z just ziz guy, you know?