Angle on speeding ticket - Advice please.

Good question. I made it into idiot boy's kill file easy enough..

 

Shit Johno; I'd even drink Coopers with you!

 

Lucky lucky bastard!!

 

It's got good and bad sides. I mean I can't bait him .. those were the
days. I certainly don't miss being insulted by him though but it's not
like that's a drama..

 

The only trouble drinking with johno is that after 3 beers you've got to
find another person to drink with!


G-S

 

I've never heard it called *that* before

 

Pass....

VB johno?


G-S

 

--
Regards,

Bada

It did give one but I did not state the actual road name.

"Now the road nominated as where the alleged offence took place has both 60
and 80 klm/h limits"

Problem is the photograph was almost completely blacked out and as far as
anyone could tell from the image it could be an 80 klm/h zone where the
camera shot me doing 84 klm/h..

 

To quote the second reply you got :

Atec77 wrote:
you are already lost because the pic is logged to a camera at a
physical location , you have to prove otherwise >onus of proof is yours.

Not sure how that can be made clearer short of using a larger font.

 

piece of 4by2?

mh

 

Yep sounds good .. paint it black, the writing on it in white .. in a
large font .. and then smack the OP over the head with it.

 

I will explain it slowly for you
The image prooves 2 things.

1.It was my bike that was clocked at 84 klm/h
2 Nothing

The "fact" that I was in a 60 zone is merely the word of the cop
Of course the camera was in a "physical location"
Isn't everything out side of the spirit world.
But the image CERTAINLY does not prove, or even indicate where that location
was.
All we have is what the cop "logged" as the location.
Now you are going to tell me that all speed cameras have a satellite
connection. dah.
Where's that piece of wood ?


Bada

 

prove otherwise

as specified under the relevant act

your point ?

perhaps not but the logged location of the camera places it in the 60k
zone and production of the image indicates you exceeded the cam
detection setting , hence you were speeding

as specified by the relevent act

no need it was looged to a location
Duh

you're going to sit on it?

 

no, its proves one thing.. its your problem

mh

 

My new mobile has a gps and can stick the co-ords on every photo you
take. Can't see why speed cameras can't do it.

Fraser

 

Perhaps because they don't have GPS in the speed cameras ?

JL
I think you meant "can't understand why they haven't implemented that
in speed cameras yet" ?

 

"In short, your Honour, I contend that this active-duty, sworn police
officer is *lying*!"

Yup. Winning strategy for a court appearance right there.

 

they dont need it by law, they have other ways of proving it..

mh

 

"In short, your Honour, I contend that this active-duty, sworn police
officer is *lying*!"

Yup. Winning strategy for a court appearance right there.



Yup. Everybody knows that no cop has ever lied.
Ever.

(if you believe that ......)

Hey sir, want to buy a watch ? Only 100 bucks.
It's a genuine Rolex.

 

In fact you're half right. They don't need it by law part is fine, they
don't actually prove it though - they just assert it, and under
legislation (in NSW and Vic anyway) that's good enough

JL