ABS brakes?

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by Paul Harris, Oct 6, 2005.

  1. Unfortunately, those tests were planned and the riders knew they had to brake hard. In an emergency you don't have those
    luxuries. You hit the brakes too hard in an emergency and you're going down. With ABS you are staying up and braking
    with control

    There is definitely a second or more when even the expert takes to get on the brakes for an emergency. With ABS you just
    squeeze the crap out the brakes immediately, and you can think about manouvering the bike instead of keep it upright.
     
    James B. Davis, Nov 12, 2005
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. I have a 1988 K100RS and there is a toggle switch on the dashpad that turns ABS off. I believe all the early Kbikes had
    that. I'm surprised they don't all have it, leave it to BMW to know what's best for us...
    Good idea. But if you're coming down a steep hill with a stop at the bottom and the road is all washboard, you better
    start braking early or you'll sail right through that stopsign. I'll turn mine off in that situation thanks.
     
    James B. Davis, Nov 12, 2005
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. Mark, this sounds very much like your battery voltage at startup is falling too low. Test with a new battery and it
    might work. Also, there is recently a long reset that has revived some ABS computers from the dead. Definitely check
    into it.
     
    James B. Davis, Nov 12, 2005
    #43
  4. Paul Harris

    Mark Hickey Guest

    The ABS switch on my '91 K100RS is a momentary switch - I believe it's
    just a reset switch rather than an on/off switch.

    Of course, on MY bike (with the fried ABS computer), it's really just
    a switch that resets the blinking ABS error light to a continuous ABS
    error light.

    Mark "blinking or steady, it's annoying" Hickey
     
    Mark Hickey, Nov 12, 2005
    #44
  5. Paul Harris

    Mark Hickey Guest

    Did both (read above), no joy.

    Mark "ABSless" Hickey
     
    Mark Hickey, Nov 12, 2005
    #45
  6. Bleeding ABS is no different than standard brakes. Now the cross linked
    brakes with multiple hoses everywhere might prove a bit of a challenge.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 12, 2005
    #46
  7. Sorry about that. I forgot to add YMMV. My experience doesn't cover all
    makes and models.

    I remember one BMW car that came in for cooling system service. It required
    you to jack up the front end to a certain degreed angle to get all the air
    out of the cooling system. It was a rather steep angle too if I recall
    correctly.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 13, 2005
    #47
  8. ABS isn't the only thing to worry about in 20 years. What about the
    electronic ignition, fuel injection system, and other things like engine
    management.

    To be honest things like ECU would worry me more than ABS. ABS can be
    bypassed. An ECU cannot. If someone came up with a universal ECU in the
    next 10-20 years then that would be fine but I dont expect that to happen.
    Repair an ECU? Not unless you are very lucky. I have seen what Bosch
    has done with ABS controllers and it isn't pretty. To repair a broken
    wire that is internal to the unit, one needs a micro soldering station,
    stereo microscope, etc to repair it. The wires are at least 1/2 the
    diameter of the finest baby hair. I have seen the wires connecting the
    external leads of a chip to the silicon die inside an IC and this is much
    thinner.

    Planned obsolescence is now finally here for bikes.

    The other killer is that there is no reason that the ECU or ABS controller
    should cost more than $200 retail. I don't see but $20 - $30 in parts
    inside one including the case.

    Having said all that, my next bike is going to have ABS and electronic
    fuel injection. If it turns to junk in 20-30 years I will not be riding
    then anyway. Hopefully I will be dead.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 13, 2005
    #48
  9. I may be able to enlighten you. I work for a computer manufacturer. We
    have our own proprietary disk controller board. If you look at our disk
    controller board, you'll see maybe $200 worth of parts. Nevertheless,
    the actual cost of the board is significantly higher, both in terms of
    amortized NRE (non-recurring engineering) and simply because we build
    high end systems thus buy these boards in quantity 100 (which is
    expensive) rather than in quantity 1,000 or, better yet, 100,000, where
    we could get them manufacturered for much cheaper (on a per-unit basis).

    Now, granted, this board is slightly more complex than the one inside an
    ECU or ABS controller. But since we are basically using reference
    designs, our NRE is much lower than for a ECU or ABS controller, where I
    suspect the NRE is multiple millions of dollars (and up). But the point
    is that when you are doing small production runs of a proprietary
    technology, it is expensive. And motorcycles ARE small production runs,
    by the standards of the electronics industry. BMW sells, what, less than
    100,000 motorcycles world-wide in a year? Peanuts. Even if they all used
    the exact same hardware and were bought in lots of 1,000 delivered every
    two weeks, they would go through a "small batch" electronics
    manufacturer rather than one of the high-quantity Asian vendors, and
    when you divide the number of units sold by the NRE costs, then add in a
    hefty dealer markup, you see the hefty costs you see at the dealership
    (especially from small-quantity vendors like BMW, which unlike Honda
    cannot leverage the same technology across millions of bikes sold
    world-wide thus must amortize NRE across a much smaller number of units).

    Now I hear you ask: "Why isn't some supplier coming out with a
    'universal' ABS and ECU?" The answer is that there is significant NRE
    involved in creating an ABS or ECU system that is flexible enough to be
    used with a wide spectrum of possible hardware, and few customers, since
    the major manufacturers already have their own designs. Thus it is
    impossible to design and sell one for less than what the major
    manufacturers sell them, you cannot amortize the NRE over enough units
    to make it viable. It is simple dollars and cents... the manufacturers
    see proprietary advantage in maintaining their own designs, thus there
    simply is no market for a "universal" ABS and ECU unit. Not yet, anyhow...

    - Elron
     
    L. Ron Waddle, Nov 13, 2005
    #49
  10. <snip>

    One of the most thoughtful and intelligent posts I've read on this
    forum.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 13, 2005
    #50
  11. Well put Gene!

    It may seem like a kluge but lets face it, one is dealing with a closed
    hydralic system. One has to deal with issues like detection of the rate of
    speed change, relative speed of the vehicle, a mechanism to back off the
    pressure when necessary no matter how high the incoming pressure is, and do
    it without a loss of master cyliner pressure. It will never be pretty. If
    we had an electric brake system instead of hydralic then it would be a lot
    easier to design an ABS. We already have throttle by wire so the next
    logical step is brake by wire. Fly by wire has been around for years and
    that has worked quite well.

    My next bike will still have ABS and fuel injection because I want it and I
    will pay extra for ABS and happily pay extra too.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 13, 2005
    #51
  12. "You're a pessimist", replied Schroedinger, "it is half-alive!!!"
     
    Brother-Peter, Nov 13, 2005
    #52
  13. Me 2, already almost six hours now!
     
    Brother-Peter, Nov 13, 2005
    #53
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.