A dilema

Co-titleholder with Bullshit Bear of 'Most Venemous UKRMer' for four years
running.

--
des
'It is hard to see how the Arab world, still less the Arabs of
Palestine, will suffer from what is mere recognition of accomplished
fact - the presence in Palestine of a compact, well organized, and
virtually autonomous Jewish community'
(_The Times_ editorial, 01 December 1947)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>

 

Fascinating person, though.
--
des
'All societies on the verge of death are masculine. A society can
survive with only one man; no society will survive a shortage of women'
(Germaine Greer (1939 - ))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>

 

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, JackH

I really have no idea what you're trying to say there.

 

Why should he approach Steve? All he did was post that someone from ukrm
had been rucking with someone they'd never met. Big deal.

 

I think maybe you need to get out more if you find that amusing.

HTH

 

<collapses, mortally wounded>

It doesn't prove anything really other than for whatever reason I
obviously still irritate you / you're not that keen on me.

Thing is, it wasn't so long ago you made a point of posting up you'd
lobbed me in your killfile... so is there any particular reason why
you've taken me out of it given the above appears to still apply?

 

He's obviously aggrieved by events that happened off group, and more
to the point, were nothing connected with the group... so to my mind
at least, if you've got a grievance with someone in such
circumstances, you'd approach them direct rather than saying **** all
to them and instead choose to raise it as an issue in here... that, or
you'd remember that your mate is an adult and can deal with his own
problems rather than wiping his arse for him.

 

Yes... I suppose she was, really.

I don't think she'd invested much time in reading 'How to Win Friends
and Influence People' before posting in here, mind.

 

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, JackH

Really? Deft application of an apposite quote?

No, no, I'll stay amused.

Ta.

 

'Small things amuse small minds'

Didn't have you down as one of those, but hey ho.

 

Omission not commission - new computer.

 

Venemous, what a brilliant word. Need a definition for it now.

 

Why should i approach anyone, both parties brought my fucking name into
something i had **** all to do with, that makes it open fucking season in my
book.

But, if you took the time to read what i wrote to Steve on here, you might
just want to take your face for a shit you argumentative ****.

Now, **** off.

 

Not being funny Jack














No, you're not.

 

Brought your name into it how other than crossing swords with each
other and happening to kick it all off initially on your wall on FB,
you know, that net based social network thing that isn't in any way
intrinsically linked to UKRM?

Methinks you still don't get it, do you...

I read that, aye... hence why I bothered to highlight the fact you'd
omitted to mention how you'd not bothered approaching Steve before
posting a whinge about whether you should out someone for something
that is **** all to do with the group, on here - it's quite a relevant
point when it comes to the question of why the post was made in the
first place.

Do you get it now, Nige?

It marks you out as something of a... well, I'll let others work that
one out for themselves, but I certainly wouldn't be wearing the badge
with pride on that one if it were me.

 

You are the most fucking single minded argumentative child on here, you seem
to take joy in contributing absolutely **** al about anything at all, let
alone bike related, you just want to argue the toss over someone elses
fights/squabbles. Whatever I may be, I arent you.

If it makes you feel better to cast your wide knowledge of **** all over me,
feel free you boring tedious idiot of a man.

It's not like you dont have form for it, is it?

Twat.

 

Have you lost your job again? You've obviously decided it's time to have
an arguement or two and I wondered why.

 

Pip escribió:

Funny how wrong one can be. Without being wrong at all, Superman.

So, Alan died. Shame, I quite liked him.

 

How do you define someone's sex? E.g. if a baby has a willy, & is
therefore considered a boy, but develops boobs, & has a scan that shows
he's also got most of the female sex organs, is he male or female?

By your reasoning, he'd still be male as that's what he was before
anyone knew differently, even if 90% of his sex organs are female &
mentally he feels female.

 

I'd start by trying to define 'venomous', actually.