4-pot caliper mounted backwards

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by Rob Kleinschmidt, Oct 27, 2005.

  1. I've recently mounted a four piston bolthole compatable caliper
    on my bike in place of the original two pot. Piston areas are
    about the same. Braking is markedly improved, mostly I suspect
    because of the larger pad area.

    One oddity about this swap is that the 34/32mm caliper now mounts
    with the larger piston driving the leading (rearmost) edge of the
    brake pads. In its original application, the leading edge was driven
    by the 32mm piston and the trailing edge by the 34mm.
    edge of the pads. Not sure what effect it'd have on stopping power.
    Seems as if it might actually improve stopping. Might be possible
    to get around the wear problems by swapping pad positions
    occasionally, though this seems like a PITA.

    I'm interested in any thoughts on this setup and what I might
    expect long term.
     
    Rob Kleinschmidt, Oct 27, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Rob Kleinschmidt

    sammm Guest

    just a thought:
    if the caliper was designed, originally, to be on the other side disk of the
    same wheel,
    this would give the same situation.
    i take it you have a single disk on the wheel, tho.
    in the final analysis, i wouldn't expect much difference in the wear
    situation.
    there's not any 'servo effect' like some drum brakes.
    good luck, sammmmm
     
    sammm, Oct 27, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. The caliper is a left side caliper intended to mount behind the
    fork, now mounted on the right side in front of the fork.
    I'm kind of mystified why a mfr would go to the trouble of using
    two different piston sizes if it had no effect and served no useful
    purpose. Not to say this kind of stuff doesn't happen occasionally
    though.
     
    Rob Kleinschmidt, Oct 28, 2005
    #3
  4. I'd have thought it was "mainly cosmetic" to attempt to get even
    pad wear; the difference in force between 32 and 34 mm pistons (if I've
    understood your description properly) is 34^2/32^2 = (17/16)^2, or +13%.
    However, I can't quickly come up with a reason why two equal-sized
    pistons would create asymmetric wear, tho' it seems to be widely believed:
    http://www.buybrakes.com/brembo/faq.html#q12
    So you might find the leading edge wearing ~25% more than the trailing...


    --
    Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration,
    Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
    GSX600F, RG250WD, DT175MX-MIA "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
    WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
    KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
     
    Dr Ivan D. Reid, Oct 28, 2005
    #4
  5. That explains why my equal sized piston caliers wear the pads unevenly.
    It isn't much mind you, just about 10%. I think the leading edge of the
    pad wears faster but I could be wrong. My calipers are behind the fork.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Oct 28, 2005
    #5
  6. Rob Kleinschmidt

    Charlie Gary Guest

    Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote:
    <<Snip>>

    Leverage. Forces are trying to rotate the pad as it rubs on the disc.
     
    Charlie Gary, Oct 28, 2005
    #6
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.